AleForge
Company Profile & Results
AleForge puts our customer's security, privacy, and performance foremost for each and every one of our customers. Unlike other providers, we never oversell our hosting and provide fully transparent statistics about uptime, resource usage, and more on our status page. To ensure the security of your web sites AleForge provides daily backups, a Web Application Firewall, free SSL certificates, and more as standard. Let us take the hassle out of web hosting and enjoy the worry-free experience AleForge will provide.
Disclaimer: Descriptions are provided by the company.
Historical Performance Summary
| Year | <$25 | $25-50 | $51-100 | $101-200 | $201-500 | Enterprise ($500+) | Woo Commerce |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | |||||||
| 2021 |
2026 WordPress Results
<$25/Month Summary
AleForge had near-perfect uptime (99.9996% / 100% / 100%), the third fastest Static test at this tier (6.3ms), and the second fastest GTmetrix average. SSL was A+. Unfortunately the LoadStorm test ran into issues, things started to slow down around 300 VUsers and the error rate jumped around 500 VUsers. The errors were primarily 429s indicating a rate limit. The Static result was excellent on its own but the LoadStorm wall keeps AleForge out of award contention this year.
AleForge issued the following statement:
Aleforge recently participated in the WP Hosting Benchmarks evaluation. While we are satisfied with the platform's overall throughput and stability measures, we wish to clarify the technical parameters behind the 429 (Too Many Requests) errors observed in the review.
These errors did not indicate system faults or security policy enforcement. Instead, they resulted from resource-based rate limiting operating as intended during high-load simulation.
Here is what actually happened:
Extreme Uncacheable Load: The benchmark simulated logged-in user requests, bypassing all edge caching systems. The origin server workload rapidly increased from 2,000 to nearly 70,000 uncached, dynamic requests per minute.
Strict Worker Allocation: The hosting plan test limits the number of PHP worker processes to 3. Our dynamic request-queuing architecture successfully routed and executed thousands of incoming requests, but a 3-worker configuration cannot process 70,000 concurrent dynamic transactions per minute.
Expected System Response: Upon maxing out the processing queue, our platform initiated automated rate limiting to maintain server integrity, resulting in controlled issuance of 429 errors.
Importantly, despite this jump in uncacheable traffic, the site stayed online as measured by ReviewSignal at 99.9996%.
The 429 errors demonstrate our safeguards working effectively under extreme load. In real-life scenarios with tens of thousands of concurrent, logged-in users, more PHP workers would simply be provisioned.
We stand by the quality of our platform. Our infrastructure handles massive traffic spikes, and resource-limiting safeguards keep servers stable and online for users.
LoadStorm
Load Storm is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.
K6
K6 is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.
GTmetrix
GTmetrix loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. (We switched from WebPageTest to GTmetrix in 2026.)
Uptime
Uptime is monitored by three sources: HetrixTools and StatusCake as third-party services, plus a self-hosted UptimeKuma instance for cross-reference in case of major discrepancy between the third-party monitors.
WPPerformanceTester
WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other a PHP benchmark. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better. WP Bench is red in the chart, PHP Bench is blue.
WPBenchmark
WPBenchmark is a hosting performance benchmark that produces a single composite score per server. Higher is better.
| Company | WPBenchmark Score |
|---|---|
| AleForge 2026 25 | 7.3 |
SSL
The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/
| Company | Qualsys SSL Grade |
|---|---|
| AleForge 2026 25 | A+ |
2021 WordPress Results
<$25/Month Summary
LoadStorm
Load Storm is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.
K6
K6 is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.
WebPageTest
WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world.
Uptime
Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.
WPPerformanceTester
WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other a PHP benchmark. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better. WP Bench is red in the chart, PHP Bench is blue.
SSL
The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/
| Company | Qualsys SSL Grade |
|---|---|
| AleForge 2021 25 | A |
Internet.nl
The tool is available at https://internet.nl/test-site/.
Mozilla Observatory
The tool is available at https://observatory.mozilla.org/.
| Company | Mozilla Observatory |
|---|---|
| AleForge 2021 25 | F |