<$25/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2022
Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.
Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.
Cloudways competed with a Digital Ocean Premium 1GB droplet.
The Companies and Products
Company | Plan Monthly Price | Plan Visitors Allowed | Plan Memory | Plan Disk Space | Plan Bandwidth | Plan Sites Allowed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20i | 5.99 GBP | Unlimited | Unlimited | 10 | 50 | 1 |
34SP.com | 9.95 GBP | Unlimited | 1.25GB | 20 GB | Unlimited | 1 |
Cloudways | 10 | Unlimited | 1 GB | 25 GB | 1 TB | Unlimited |
DreamHost | $19.95 | Unlimited (recommended limits but not enforced) | 1.5 GB | 30 GB | Unlimited | 1 |
EasyWP by Namecheap | $13.88 | 500,000 | 1152 MB | 100 GB | Unlimited | 1 |
Eco Web Hosting | £5.99 | Unlimited | Autoscaling with no hard limit | 25 GB | Unlimited | 1 |
GoDaddy | $24.99 | Unlimited | - | Unlimited | Unlimited | 1 |
GreenGeeks | $15.95 | Unlimited | 2 GB | Unlimited | Unmetered | Unlimited |
HostXNow | £14 | Unlimited | 4 | 50 GB NVMe SSD | Unlimited | Unlimited |
ICDSoft | $10 | Unlimited | 2 GB Per process memory limit | 100 GB | 5 TB | 1 |
InMotion Hosting | 23.99 | No set limit, suitable for 125,000 | No set limit. | No set limit. | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Krystal Hosting | £9.99 | Unlimited | 2 GB | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Lightning Base | 9.95 | 10,000, but this is not monitored/limited. | 3 GB | 1 GB | 40 GB | 1 |
ManagedWPHosting | 11 | Unlimited | account has at least 256MB PHP RAM, server has 12 GB at least | 5 GB | 50 GB | 1 |
MechanicWeb | $19.25 | Unlimited | 3 GB | 30 GB | 300 GB | Unlimited |
Nexcess | 19 | unmetered | cloud - variable bursts | 15 GB | 2 TB | 1 |
Pressable | $19 | 5,000 | 512 MB / Process | 10 GB | Unlimited | 1 |
raidboxes | 15€ | Unlimited | 2 GB | 5 GB | 1Gbit | 1 |
RSHosting.com | $20 | 25,000 | 2 GB | Unlimited | Unlimited | 5 |
Sailed.io | $24 | Unlimited | 4 GB | 80 GB NVMe SSD | 4TB | Unlimited |
SiteGround | $24.99 | No hard limit. Recommend ~100,000 | N/A | 20 GB | Unlimited | No limit |
VapourHost | 8.99 USD | Not limited | 2.5 GB | 35 GB | 1500 GB | Unlimited |
WPCycle | 19.95 | 100,000 unique visits per month | 2 GB | 10 GB | Unlimited | 2 |
WPX | $24.99 | Unlimited | 256 MB per PHP process, 3 PHP processes per website | 10 GB | 100 GB | 5 |
LoadStorm Testing Results
The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.
The key metrics are:
- Total Requests - Number of requests k6 made
- Total Errors - Number of error requests
- p95 - The 95th percentile response time
- Page Cum Avg - Cumulative average response time for Pages (html)
- Asset Cum Avg - Cumulative average response time for Assets (css, js, images)
- Login Cum Avg - Cumulative average response time for Login (wp-profile.php)
- WP-Login Avg Response Time - Average response time for login (301 redirect which validates credentials)
Results Table
Company | Total Requests | Total Errors | Peak Rps | Average Rps | P95 | Page Cum Avg | Asset Cum Avg | Login Cum Avg | Wp-login Average Response Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20i | 326928 | 50 | 308.17 | 177 | 1095 | 635 | 275 | 506 | 345 |
34SP.com | 333663 | 0 | 285.58 | 181 | 803 | 354 | 301 | 358 | 218 |
Cloudways | 160790 | 229 | 137.75 | 87 | 21119 | 10154 | 5415 | 9761 | 10920 |
DreamHost | 224531 | 0 | 166.92 | 122 | 18559 | 10589 | 898 | 11020 | 10747 |
EasyWP by Namecheap | 338855 | 4 | 296.83 | 184 | 361 | 195 | 168 | 190 | 180 |
Eco Web Hosting | 326444 | 1 | 282.83 | 177 | 1087 | 620 | 278 | 507 | 349 |
GoDaddy | 446867 | 202 | 496.33 | 242 | 751 | 430 | 184 | 404 | 1937 |
GreenGeeks | 330718 | 27 | 301.08 | 180 | 711 | 372 | 270 | 294 | 154 |
HostXNow | 352194 | 6 | 307.92 | 192 | 823 | 408 | 270 | 398 | 265 |
ICDSoft | 341159 | 30 | 303.5 | 185 | 341 | 153 | 156 | 148 | 144 |
InMotion Hosting | 548858 | 66121 | 482.42 | 298 | 779 | 253 | 310 | 336 | 262 |
Krystal Hosting | 253314 | 0 | 197.25 | 137 | 10495 | 5165 | 624 | 5696 | 5512 |
Lightning Base | 349819 | 0 | 299.17 | 190 | 583 | 274 | 237 | 360 | 187 |
ManagedWPHosting | 343458 | 205 | 336.83 | 186 | 1823 | 1237 | 324 | 1333 | 1323 |
MechanicWeb | 354324 | 0 | 302.17 | 193 | 759 | 272 | 274 | 281 | 144 |
Nexcess | 376494 | 10 | 338.25 | 205 | 493 | 279 | 140 | 277 | 257 |
Pressable | 425398 | 0 | 359.92 | 231 | 321 | 202 | 73 | 239 | 217 |
raidboxes | 267872 | 34779 | 268.42 | 146 | 1231 | 1494 | 441 | 13148 | 30068 |
RSHosting.com | 242581 | 0 | 184.17 | 132 | 12991 | 6637 | 777 | 7648 | 7255 |
Sailed.io | 320975 | 0 | 285.75 | 174 | 1591 | 998 | 270 | 821 | 699 |
SiteGround | 351276 | 0 | 303.75 | 191 | 126 | 71 | 27 | 576 | 647 |
VapourHost | 306681 | 63 | 293.5 | 167 | 3855 | 2095 | 425 | 2544 | 2248 |
WPCycle | 336295 | 0 | 294 | 183 | 695 | 256 | 289 | 300 | 168 |
WPX | 351095 | 0 | 292.42 | 191 | 1071 | 611 | 15 | 741 | 500 |
Discussion
20i, 34SP.com, EasyWP by NameCheap, Eco Web Hosting, GreenGeeks, HostXNow, ICDSoft, Lightning Base, MechanicWeb, Nexcess, Pressable, SiteGround, WPCycle and WPX all didn't have issues with the Load Storm test.
Cloudways started to slow down around 300 VUsers.
DreamHost started to slow down around 450 VUsers but never had an error.
GoDaddy handled the test quite well but the wp-login response times were a bit high.
InMotion Hosting appeared to hit a rate limit that couldn't be bypassed, so while the response times look good, there were quite a few 429 errors.
Krystal Hosting started to slow down around 600 VUsers.
ManagedWPHosting had some spikes which brought the response times up.
Raidboxes struggled with the test with increasing load times into errors.
RSHosting.com began to slow down around 550 VUsers.
Sailed.io started to slow down around 900 VUsers.
VapourHost started to show signs of load around 1000 VUsers.
SiteGround picked up the fastest P95 and page load times.
ICDSoft picked up the fastest login cumavg and tied for fastest wp-login with MechanicWeb.
WPX picked up the fastest asset average.
20i, Eco Web Hosting and WPX all had P95 response times over 1000ms but showed no signs of load increasing and were awarded Top Tier status because their server locations potentially favored US locations over other locations for the P95 metric.
K6 Static Testing Results
K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.
Results Table
Company | Requests | Errors | Peak Rps | Average Response Time | Average Rps | P95 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20i | 426913 | 0 | 945.33 | 55 | 469 | 170 |
34SP.com | 359915 | 0 | 795.67 | 251 | 396 | 531 |
Cloudways | 368873 | 0 | 818.17 | 221 | 404 | 467 |
DreamHost | 367520 | 0 | 814.5 | 225 | 403 | 475 |
EasyWP by Namecheap | 394934 | 0 | 869 | 140 | 434 | 251 |
Eco Web Hosting | 427021 | 0 | 947.33 | 55 | 469 | 167 |
GoDaddy | 364038 | 16 | 808.67 | 234 | 400 | 519 |
GreenGeeks | 364638 | 0 | 801.83 | 235 | 400 | 439 |
HostXNow | 360626 | 0 | 796.83 | 249 | 395 | 555 |
ICDSoft | 384812 | 0 | 850.33 | 169 | 421 | 345 |
InMotion Hosting | 367752 | 0 | 808.33 | 224 | 402 | 527 |
Krystal Hosting | 366106 | 0 | 810.17 | 230 | 402 | 547 |
Lightning Base | 364565 | 0 | 799.17 | 235 | 400 | 495 |
ManagedWPHosting | 351630 | 40 | 800.17 | 264 | 385 | 567 |
MechanicWeb | 360455 | 0 | 792.33 | 250 | 396 | 551 |
Nexcess | 358558 | 0 | 792 | 255 | 394 | 481 |
Pressable | 447740 | 0 | 986.67 | 5.9 | 489 | 18 |
raidboxes | 358418 | 0 | 794.17 | 257 | 394 | 575 |
RSHosting.com | 355409 | 0 | 779.83 | 267 | 391 | 503 |
Sailed.io | 369260 | 0 | 816.83 | 220 | 406 | 469 |
SiteGround | 442044 | 0 | 981.17 | 19 | 485 | 67 |
VapourHost | 358266 | 0 | 790.17 | 257 | 392 | 575 |
WPCycle | 361582 | 0 | 795.67 | 246 | 396 | 457 |
WPX | 443718 | 0 | 976.83 | 15 | 486 | 89 |
Discussion
ManagedWPHosting had a few minor spikes where load time went up.
Everyone else handled the Static test without issue.
It's truly impressive to see how much performance has come along even from the year before where multiple companies seriously struggled with this test.
Pressable had some very fast average and p95 response times at 5.9ms and 18ms respectively.
WPX and SiteGround were not far behind at 15ms and 19ms average response times. 20i and EcoWebHosting were tied at 55ms average response times.
It's almost unbelievable the slowest average response time was a mere 267ms and p95 was 575ms. That means for <$25, you could pick any of the 25 companies tested and your website would be delivering static homepages within a quarter of a second on average globally or in about half a second for the 95th percentile of users. Incredible.
Uptime Testing Results
Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.
Results Table
Company | Uptime Robot | Hetrix |
---|---|---|
20i | 99.999 | 100 |
34SP.com | 99.999 | 99.9943 |
Cloudways | 100 | 99.8342 |
DreamHost | 99.997 | 99.9991 |
EasyWP by Namecheap | 99.961 | 99.9414 |
Eco Web Hosting | 100 | 100 |
GoDaddy | 99.985 | 99.9973 |
GreenGeeks | 99.999 | 99.994 |
HostXNow | 99.99 | 99.9406 |
ICDSoft | 99.959 | 99.948 |
InMotion Hosting | 99.988 | 99.9707 |
Krystal Hosting | 100 | 100 |
Lightning Base | 99.998 | 99.9982 |
ManagedWPHosting | 99.999 | 99.9969 |
MechanicWeb | 99.998 | 99.9971 |
Nexcess | 99.875 | 99.8823 |
Pressable | 99.997 | 100 |
raidboxes | 99.999 | 99.9981 |
RSHosting.com | 99.969 | 99.9651 |
Sailed.io | 100 | 100 |
SiteGround | 99.99 | 99.9959 |
VapourHost | 99.806 | 99.8007 |
WPCycle | 99.688 | 99.6575 |
WPX | 100 | 100 |
Discussion
Cloudways had an issue with Hetrix Tools on every plan tested this year which showed very different result because of downtime which Hetrix Tools reported but UptimeRobot had no issues during the window.
Nexcess, VapourHost and WPCycle fell below the 99.9% uptime threshold.
Every other company was above the 99.9% threshold.
20i, EcoWebHosting, Krystal, Pressable, Sailed.io and WPX all reported perfect uptime on at least one monitor.
WebPageTest Testing Results
WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.
Results Table
Company | Virginia | California | Salt Lake City | London | Frankfurt | Cape Town | Singapore | Mumbai | Tokyo | Sydney | Brazil | Dubai | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20i | 0.373 | 0.216 | 0.805 | 0.144 | 0.222 | 0.244 | 0.325 | 0.718 | 0.302 | 0.84 | 0.687 | 0.692 | 0.464 |
34SP.com | 0.625 | 0.854 | 0.838 | 0.223 | 0.222 | 0.866 | 0.93 | 0.763 | 1.457 | 1.437 | 1.039 | 0.738 | 0.8326666667 |
Cloudways | 0.177 | 0.422 | 0.344 | 0.431 | 0.515 | 1.23 | 1.191 | 1.085 | 0.895 | 1.107 | 0.67 | 1.017 | 0.757 |
DreamHost | 0.22 | 0.419 | 0.416 | 0.521 | 0.799 | 1.213 | 1.295 | 1.08 | 0.988 | 1.124 | 0.718 | 1.092 | 0.82375 |
EasyWP by Namecheap | 0.479 | 0.236 | 0.356 | 0.857 | 0.877 | 1.582 | 1.037 | 1.368 | 0.811 | 1.18 | 1.007 | 1.39 | 0.9316666667 |
Eco Web Hosting | 0.329 | 0.207 | 0.522 | 0.165 | 0.196 | 0.213 | 0.322 | 0.717 | 0.211 | 0.832 | 0.71 | 0.708 | 0.4276666667 |
GoDaddy | 0.303 | 0.471 | 0.471 | 0.459 | 0.47 | 1.536 | 1.124 | 1.396 | 0.815 | 1.242 | 1.031 | 1.259 | 0.8814166667 |
GreenGeeks | 0.258 | 0.246 | 0.261 | 0.319 | 0.495 | 0.813 | 0.699 | 0.721 | 0.588 | 0.641 | 0.482 | 0.695 | 0.5181666667 |
HostXNow | 0.53 | 0.856 | 0.877 | 0.202 | 0.366 | 0.865 | 1.5 | 0.819 | 1.366 | 1.504 | 1.065 | 0.688 | 0.8865 |
ICDSoft | 0.273 | 0.479 | 0.47 | 0.592 | 0.64 | 1.231 | 1.425 | 1.117 | 1.02 | 1.204 | 0.83 | 1.088 | 0.8640833333 |
InMotion Hosting | 0.203 | 0.52 | 0.399 | 0.548 | 0.818 | 1.425 | 1.472 | 1.262 | 1.205 | 1.648 | 0.849 | 1.252 | 0.96675 |
Krystal Hosting | 0.22 | 0.511 | 0.485 | 0.49 | 0.546 | 1.348 | 1.318 | 1.214 | 1.21 | 1.416 | 0.736 | 1.241 | 0.8945833333 |
Lightning Base | 0.317 | 0.342 | 0.335 | 0.601 | 0.791 | 1.383 | 1.035 | 1.327 | 0.799 | 1.035 | 0.848 | 1.345 | 0.8465 |
ManagedWPHosting | 0.641 | 1.009 | 0.935 | 0.225 | 0.159 | 1.026 | 1.355 | 0.867 | 1.605 | 1.748 | 1.275 | 0.817 | 0.9718333333 |
MechanicWeb | 0.605 | 0.821 | 0.848 | 0.122 | 0.189 | 0.845 | 1.501 | 0.768 | 1.403 | 1.467 | 1.105 | 0.681 | 0.8629166667 |
Nexcess | 0.33 | 0.486 | 0.454 | 0.55 | 1.192 | 1.669 | 1.34 | 1.454 | 1.009 | 1.618 | 1.154 | 1.845 | 1.09175 |
Pressable | 0.279 | 0.336 | 0.318 | 0.226 | 0.205 | 0.286 | 0.272 | 0.449 | 0.309 | 0.253 | 0.248 | 0.482 | 0.30525 |
raidboxes | 0.603 | 0.915 | 0.824 | 0.183 | 0.176 | 0.878 | 0.924 | 0.712 | 1.285 | 1.539 | 1.134 | 0.673 | 0.8205 |
RSHosting.com | 0.647 | 0.265 | 0.238 | 0.848 | 0.901 | 1.499 | 1.081 | 1.372 | 0.788 | 0.957 | 1.069 | 1.427 | 0.9243333333 |
Sailed.io | 0.227 | 0.45 | 0.375 | 0.472 | 0.529 | 1.22 | 1.214 | 1.049 | 0.822 | 1.123 | 0.69 | 1.003 | 0.7645 |
SiteGround | 0.564 | 0.637 | 0.518 | 0.886 | 0.972 | 1.747 | 1.621 | 1.77 | 1.353 | 1.517 | 1.203 | 1.608 | 1.199666667 |
VapourHost | 0.718 | 0.925 | 0.874 | 0.27 | 0.209 | 0.889 | 0.889 | 0.727 | 1.243 | 1.56 | 1.214 | 0.696 | 0.8511666667 |
WPCycle | 0.333 | 0.459 | 0.412 | 0.626 | 0.845 | 1.344 | 1.28 | 1.221 | 0.911 | 1.165 | 0.835 | 1.131 | 0.8801666667 |
WPX | 0.17 | 0.165 | 0.192 | 0.126 | 0.138 | 0.851 | 0.129 | 0.147 | 0.133 | 0.17 | 0.128 | 0.236 | 0.2154166667 |
Discussion
WPX had the fastest average response times and was the fastest in 10/12 locations.
MechanicWeb and EcoWebHosting picked up the other two fastest single location scores.
Pressable had the second fastest average and EcoWebHosting the third fastest average.
WPPerformanceTester Testing Results
WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.
Results Table
Company | PHP Bench | WP Bench |
---|---|---|
20i | 9.289 | 489.7159647 |
34SP.com | 12.977 | 474.3833017 |
Cloudways | 7.523 | 1007.049345 |
DreamHost | 10.188 | 773.3952049 |
EasyWP by Namecheap | 9.465 | 848.1764207 |
Eco Web Hosting | 11.879 | 369.139904 |
GoDaddy | 12.715 | 534.1880342 |
GreenGeeks | 14.119 | 1392.75766 |
HostXNow | 5.077 | 4032.258065 |
ICDSoft | 10.106 | 1221.001221 |
InMotion Hosting | 10.698 | 1461.988304 |
Krystal Hosting | 8.768 | 1769.911504 |
Lightning Base | 7.975 | 749.6251874 |
ManagedWPHosting | 13.23 | 139.0240512 |
MechanicWeb | 5.08 | 2777.777778 |
Nexcess | 7.734 | 985.2216749 |
Pressable | 10.006 | 1349.527665 |
raidboxes | 11.122 | 435.5400697 |
RSHosting.com | 8.974 | 309.5975232 |
Sailed.io | 10.341 | 635.3240152 |
SiteGround | 9.757 | 1295.336788 |
VapourHost | 6.081 | 2398.081535 |
WPCycle | 15.634 | 698.8120196 |
WPX | 6.893 | 2347.41784 |
Discussion
HostXNow had the fastest PHP and WP Bench scores which was the fastest WP Bench of any plan this year.
MechanicWeb was neck and neck with HostXNow on the PHP Bench and a clear second place on the WP Bench.
VapourHost had the third fastest PHP and WP Bench scores.
SSL Testing Results
The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/
Results Table
Company | Qualsys SSL Grade |
---|---|
20i | A |
34SP.com | A |
Cloudways | A |
DreamHost | A+ |
EasyWP by Namecheap | A+ |
Eco Web Hosting | A |
GoDaddy | A |
GreenGeeks | A+ |
HostXNow | A |
ICDSoft | A |
InMotion Hosting | B |
Krystal Hosting | A |
Lightning Base | A |
ManagedWPHosting | A+ |
MechanicWeb | A |
Nexcess | A |
Pressable | A |
raidboxes | A+ |
RSHosting.com | A |
Sailed.io | A |
SiteGround | A |
VapourHost | A |
WPCycle | A+ |
WPX | A |
Discussion
DreamHost, EasyWP (NameCheap), GreenGeeks, ManagedWPHosting, Raidboxes, and WPCycle all scored an A+.
Everyone else scored an A with the exception of InMotionHosting which scored a B.
Conclusion
There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.
Top Tier
This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.
20i
34SP.com
EasyWP by Namecheap
Eco Web Hosting
GreenGeeks
HostXNow
ICDSoft
Lightning Base
MechanicWeb
Pressable
SiteGround
WPX
Honorable Mention
The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.
No company achieved this status.
Individual Host Analysis
Visit 20i Website
34SP handled both the Load Storm and Static test without issue. It had near perfect uptime with both monitors showing in excess of 99.99%. In a crowded field it's hard to stand out, but 34SP put up a Top Tier performance without a single error this year. Well done, after two Honorable Mentions in a row, 34SP finally moved up showing that hard work does pay off.Visit 34SP.com Website
Cloudways handled the Static test with ease. Cloudways had the same uptime monitoring issue with Hetrix Tools on every plan this year but Uptime Robot showed a perfect uptime. Unfortunately, Cloudways struggled with the Load Storm test which caused the server response times to go very high.Visit Cloudways Website
DreamHost handled the static test without issue. DreamHost also had excellent uptime with both monitors above 99.99%. Unfortunately, DreamHost had trouble with the Load Storm test which never errored but did slow down beginning around 450 VUsers.Visit DreamHost Website
NameCheap has had a difficult year with much of their staff being based in Ukraine and almost didn't complete the tests this year. They reported that they have been under multiple DDoS attacks and it took an incredible effort to find the resources to participate in the benchmarks. Despite all the adversity, EasyWP had the second fastest login average, third fastest page and fourth fastest P95 on the Load Storm test. EasyWP also handled the Static test without any issues. EasyWP stayed above the 99.9% threshold despite the DDoS attacks. These benchmarks have a no withdrawal policy once the benchmarking is done and NameCheap's situation tested the limit of the policy, but instead of a withdrawal, it is with great pride I can give EasyWP by Namecheap a Top Tier award.Visit EasyWP by Namecheap Website
Eco Web Hosting was tied for fourth fastest average response time and had fourth fastest p95 on the Static test. Eco Web Hosting picked up the fastest speed in Cape Town on the WPT benchmark and third fastest average. Eco Web Hosting also handled the Load Storm test without issue. Throw in some perfect uptime on both monitors and you've earned a Top Tier award. Congrats.Visit Eco Web Hosting Website
GoDaddy handled the Static test without issue. GoDaddy also had excellent uptime. GoDaddy mostly handled the Load Storm test well, the only downside was that the wp-login response times were almost 2000ms which kept it out of award contention.Visit GoDaddy Website
GreenGeeks had the third fastest wp-login on the Load Storm test. GreenGeeks handled the Static test effortlessly. Both uptime monitors showed over 99.99% uptime. Overall, it was a Top Tier performance from Green Geeks.Visit GreenGeeks Website
First time participant HostXNow had the fastest PHP and WP Bench (the fastest of any plan at any price tier). HostXNow also handled the Load Storm and Static test without issue. The blazing fast PHP and WP Bench scores definitely helped this new comer stand out and earn a Top Tier award on their first attempt. Congratulations!Visit HostXNow Website
ICDSoft had the fastest login average and tied for fastest wp-login speed, it also had the second fastest page and third fastest p95 on the Load Storm test. ICDSoft was on the faster end of the spectrum on the Static test as well. They kept their uptime above 99.9%. ICDSoft definitely upped their game from last year where they earned an Honorable Mention; this year ICDSoft deserves the Top Tier recognition for their performance. Well done.Visit ICDSoft Website
InMotion Hosting handled the Static test well. InMotion Hosting also had solid uptime. Unfortunately, there appeared to be some rate limiting blocks on the Load Storm test which caused 429 errors and kept them from earning any recognition this year.Visit InMotion Hosting Website
Krystal had perfect uptime. Krystal also handled the Static test easily. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test caused a little stress on the server and slowed down below award recognition levels.Visit Krystal Hosting Website
LightningBase handled the Load Storm and Static test without issue. LightningBase had near perfect uptime with both monitors showing above 99.998%. LightningBase is the longest continuous participating company in these benchmarks and it's nice to see them continually do well. They don't always stand out in having the absolute fastest scores or a brand that everyone talks about, but LightningBase has been a model of quiet excellence. LightningBase has earned Top Tier marks from 2014 onwards and this year is no exception. Congrats again on extending the Top Tier streak.Visit Lightning Base Website
ManagedWPHosting had excellent uptime with both monitors above 99.99%. Unfortunately, the Load Storm and Static test both stressed the server a bit and caused increase response times which keeps them out of award contention.Visit ManagedWPHosting Website
MechanicWeb tied for the fastest wp-login speed on the Load Storm test. MechanicWeb had the second fastest PHP and WP bench scores. MechanicWeb also had the fastest WPT score in London. MechanicWeb also had excellent uptime with both monitors showing above 99.99%. MechanicWeb also handled the Static test without issue. This first time participant definitely stepped into the ring prepared and put on a good show, congrats on earning Top Tier status MechanicWeb.Visit MechanicWeb Website
Nexcess had the fourth fastest asset and login average speeds on the Load Storm test. Nexcess handled the Static test without any problems. Unfortunately, the uptime fell just below the 99.9% threshold required to earn recognition.Visit Nexcess Website
Pressable had the second fastest p95, third fastest asset and login average and fourth fastest page load speed on the Load Storm test. Pressable had the fastest average and p95 on the Static test at a blazing fast 5.9ms and 18ms respectively. Pressable also had perfect and near perfect uptime. Pressable had the second fastest WPT average response time. Pressable put on quite a show of consistently being one of the fastest, well done, Top Tier.Visit Pressable Website
Raidboxes handled the Static test effortlessly. Raidboxes also had near perfect uptime with both monitors showing 99.99%+. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test overwhelmed the server causing slower response times and errors. I hope to see a bounce back next year from Raidboxes.Visit raidboxes Website
RSHosting did well on the Static test. RSHosting also kept above the 99.9% uptime threshold. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test started to slow down around 550 VUsers, I hope next year proves the old adage 'Third Time is a Charm' true for RSHosting.Visit RSHosting.com Website
Sailed.io is a first time participant and a bit different from the competition. Sailed.io offers a free and open source platform/tool for you to use to deploy your WordPress sites onto Digital Ocean. They have a premium option with paid support as well, but you're responsible to deploy Sailed onto your own droplets. Sailed.io asked to participate in the benchmarks to show their performance and after some discussion, I accepted and I'm happy to have them. But I also want to make sure readers are aware that Sailed isn't like a traditional WordPress host.Sailed had perfect uptime. It also handled the Static test without blinking. The Load Storm test did overwhelm the server starting at 900 VUsers where it slowed down a bit. Overall, it was a pretty good first run. For a tool that's available for free to deploy on your own Digital Ocean machines, it certainly puts pressure on the competition.