<$25/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2026

<$25/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2026

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Trustdom is in the process of shutting down during the testing period.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
20i 7.99 USDUnlimitedUnlimited - Autoscaling10501
34SP.com £11.95Unlimited1GB25GBUnlimited1
AleForge 19.99Unlimited512MB per CPU Core/PHP Worker25 GBUnlimited1
Bluehost $24.99Unlimited (as much as you can get out of 8 CPU seconds per second)Shared/Variable200GB NVMe StorageUnlimited100
DreamHost $23.99100K/month (soft limit)16GB30GBUnmetered1
Fasthosts £11 / $15Unlimited8 parallel PHP processes, with minimum 4 GB RAM and up to 256 processes25GB NVMe storageUnlimited1
FullHost 12.9Unlimited4GB10500GB1
GoDaddy $23.99n/a (unlimited. not limited by traffic)Up to 12 CPU Cores20GBUnmetered1
GreenGeeks $17.95Unlimited2.0 GB50 GBUnmeteredUnmetered
Heart Internet £11.99Unlimited1GBUnlimitedUnlimited1
HostArmada $19.75Unlimited640 NVMe StorageUnlimitedUnlimited
ICDSoft $12.50Unmetered4 GB100 GBUnlimited1 unique website for the main domain, 150 sites in subdomains
KnownHost 11.95Estimated to handle 100k, but there's no real limit.4GB50GB NVMeNo bandwidth limitOne
Lightning Base 9.95No hard limit. Suggested for sites under 10,0005 GB limit for PHP processes1 GB40 GB1
mijn.host 16.99€Unlimited16GB100GBUnlimited20
one.com 16.99 EURUnlimited4 GB200 GB SSD StorageUnlimitedUnlimited
Pressable $105,000512MB per PHP process (there are paid options to upgrade to 2 GB)5GBUnlimited1
Raidboxes 22€Unlimited4GB10GB1Gbit1
Strato 15 €unlimited traffic/bandwidthDue to the platform design we can't state fixed values. But for the underlying tariff we have up to 12 parallel php processes with up to 6 GB memory75unlimited1
Trustdom 19,90€unlimited1GB x 2 (2 pods)10GB s3 storageunlimited1
WP Buzz $25500KNo Hard Limits25GBUnmetered25
WPX 29.99Unlimited5GB15GB200GB5
Z.com 11.99USDUnlimited1 GB5 GBUnmetered1
Zone Media 20.96€Not limited. That depends of the speed of the web application.12 GiB512 GiBNot limited, hosting server's bandwith (usually 10000 Mb/s) which is of course shared.Unlimited.
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RPSAverage RPSPage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum AvgLogin PostP95*
20i 4709811446.52561173.8849.9975.4914.61472.7
34SP.com 5358370497.8291.2181216.7238.7398.9255
AleForge 858296223900916.4466.52158.4480.51760.22097.93127.1
Bluehost 5361028492291.4184.5173.3189.8215.2264.5
DreamHost 8130973783.3441.9209.6183.9308343.2246
Fasthosts 32518426237531.3176.8163.1128.6158.8252.9165.2
FullHost 23567125834289.1128.113829.55737.710231.614490.313693.9
GoDaddy 6473102608.5351.8259.543.4197.8306.3222.5
GreenGeeks 52680818477.4286.3258.6215.4295.9492.3311.9
Heart Internet 6015202562.6326.9323.5234.9304.3232.8384.6
HostArmada 7860199795.5427.2322.9175.4318.2521.1330.1
ICDSoft 55595928496.5302.2181.545.8133.9215.1159.5
KnownHost 2446130194.7132.34368.6754.72983.54592.23100.7
Lightning Base 5614330519.3303.5166.2193.6214.1415.2204.3
mijn.host 26873012621252.8146.1167.422.9100.594298.7
one.com 6753466157164.936.7221.8200.51163.7445.7
Pressable 5423010492.8294.8215.635.6199.4390.1188.9
Raidboxes 5259220466.3285.9540.7251.4448.3645.8555.9
Strato 20301637610391.6110.3200.7140.2185317196.2
Trustdom 55118378762480.4301.2150.213.5144.7105
WP Buzz 5812100542315.9182.471144.5293.6202.9
WPX 5500200512.5298.9182.25.3100.5257.9136.5
Z.com 432853765241.123.223560.51711.911380.624933.210371.3
Zone Media 6731820661580169683699.8206.3213.6232.5325.6245

* 2026 p95/p99 values are computed from windowed aggregates and aren't directly comparable as global tail-latency metrics. Read why.

Discussion

34SP.com, Bluehost, DreamHost, GoDaddy, GreenGeeks, Heart Internet, ICDSoft, Lightning Base, Pressable, WP Buzz, WPX, and 20i all handled the LoadStorm test without issue. Response times stayed flat for the duration of the run. The spikes in the detailed graphs are small cron-related bumps, not capacity problems.



HostArmada had multiple large spikes through the test where response times jumped substantially before settling back. 9 errors out of 786k requests is fine, so the result still earned recognition with that caveat.



KnownHost handled the test cleanly with no errors but response times started to climb around 650 VUsers.



AleForge started slowing down around 300 VUsers and errors jumped around 500 VUsers. The errors were 429s indicating a rate limit.



FullHost started to struggle around 200 VUsers with errors kicking in around 550 VUsers.



Raidboxes had its first noticeable spike around 600 VUsers and became less stable around 900 VUsers.



Fasthosts and Strato both ran fine for roughly the first 20 minutes and then a security or resource-throttling measure kicked in and the server stopped responding for the remainder of the test. Same shape on both (both IONOS-owned), likely the same platform policy.



mijn.host and Trustdom both had wp-login blocked partway through the test by a security measure that couldn't be worked around.



Zone Media looked flat until a rate-limit/security measure kicked in and from that point on the test was all errors.



one.com and Z.com both struggled The server slowed down and stopped responding to most requests well before the test finished.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RPSAverage Response TimeAverage RPSP95*
20i 4427490971.113.3486.527.5
34SP.com 3959790872.4139.8435.1338.1
AleForge 4464660979.66.3490.613.1
Bluehost 4412440965.818.4484.932.9
DreamHost 3993520872.4125.3438.8152
Fasthosts 3979171875.6136.8437.3143.8
FullHost 4056870891.4114445.8121.5
GoDaddy 4376801959.826.348141.3
GreenGeeks 4014430870.1130436.4178.2
Heart Internet 3647070739.4249.7400.8266.8
HostArmada 4067490888109.8447116
ICDSoft 4021390885.4128.6441.9148.4
KnownHost 4020230875.7123.8441.8148.9
Lightning Base 4056430893.1111.3445.8116.3
mijn.host 4438243976.112.2487.716
one.com 7785475716233.9217.283.7420.3
Pressable 4465300973.95.1490.78.4
Raidboxes 3229230502.4328.3354.9380.4
Strato 3973691870136.1436.7142.7
Trustdom 3177590718.62895341.73494.5
WP Buzz 4461780976.46.9490.310.1
WPX 4473180978.75.9491.610.2
Z.com 669379879.25817.8727130.9
Zone Media 397452372761879.3154.7436.8182.1

* 2026 p95/p99 values are computed from windowed aggregates and aren't directly comparable as global tail-latency metrics. Read why.

Discussion

Pressable had the fastest average response time at 5.1ms. WPX was second at 5.9ms (the cached portion was 3.73-4.16ms; the average is pulled up by the cold uncached hit at the start). AleForge was third at 6.3ms. WP Buzz (6.9ms), mijn.host (12.2ms), 20i (13.3ms), Bluehost (18.4ms), and GoDaddy (26.3ms) were also sub-30ms.



The line between companies running aggressive edge caching and those serving from origin is pretty clear at this tier — the next cluster sits in the 100-140ms range and largely matches the no-CDN configurations.



Zone Media's static result is a rate-limit story, not a performance story — the test started flat and then the same security measure that broke the dynamic test broke the static one. Trustdom (2.9s) and Z.com (5.8s) had the static test slow before completing. one.com's static came back quickly (217ms average) for the requests that returned, but 75,716 of 77,854 requests errored.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by three sources: HetrixTools and StatusCake as third-party services, plus a self-hosted UptimeKuma instance for cross-reference in case of major discrepancy between the third-party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyHetrixToolsStatusCakeUptimeKuma
20i 10099.9999.9643
34SP.com 99.997610099.9824
AleForge 99.9996100100
Bluehost 99.989799.9599.9679
DreamHost 99.973899.9799.7822
Fasthosts 99.883499.9999.976
FullHost 99.980599.9799.9735
GoDaddy 99.981299.9799.9725
GreenGeeks 99.989599.9899.9191
Heart Internet 99.989310099.9871
HostArmada 99.984699.9999.9841
ICDSoft 99.98699.9899.9823
KnownHost 99.992499.9799.9841
Lightning Base 10010099.9988
mijn.host 99.951999.9199.9128
one.com 99.983899.9899.9746
Pressable 100100100
Raidboxes 99.994699.9999.9936
Strato 99.9699.9999.9754
Trustdom 99.995499.9899.9689
WP Buzz 10099.9999.9982
WPX 10099.9199.7822
Z.com 99.974599.9799.9049
Zone Media 99.996110099.9701

Discussion

Only three results came in below 99.9% on a single monitor: DreamHost and WPX both posted 99.78% on the self-hosted UptimeKuma instance, and Fasthosts posted 99.88% on HetrixTools. DreamHost and WPX share the exact same UptimeKuma value — the same number across two unrelated hosts almost always points at the monitor rather than the hosts, and both of their other two monitors were above 99.96%. The Fasthosts dip was only on HetrixTools while StatusCake (99.99%) and UptimeKuma (99.98%) had no issues, so it gets the same benefit of the doubt.



Pressable was the only company with 100% across all three monitors. Lightning Base, WP Buzz, WPX, AleForge, 20i, and Heart Internet each hit 100% on at least one monitor. Everyone else was 99.9%+ across all three.

GTmetrix Testing Results

GTmetrix loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. (We switched from WebPageTest to GTmetrix in 2026.) Results are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSan Antonio TXLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubai
20i 6389517582232811400160016001400140014001400
34SP.com 671902784226328110014001800150015001100758
AleForge 4222732623635238497601300588668474366
Bluehost 45245746574266784467211006787331100718
DreamHost 588330423703940190012001200903100010001200
Fasthosts 66296775728822411001200830160016001200954
FullHost 438490432635792150013001200824100012001000
GoDaddy 2241392262501932591000200055111001600516
GreenGeeks 2953243306476211200100012007671000822975
Heart Internet 877140012002603931800180016002200230017001100
HostArmada 3426675566557381500150018001100150010001300
ICDSoft 35358341654169412001300160011001200820992
KnownHost 29149432765365613001300160092711007741200
Lightning Base 363475352676724140014001700893120011001400
mijn.host 685797838257272130092113001100160010002200
one.com 692160080627725010009857931800160017001400
Pressable 2183262626408891200754990666701799381
Raidboxes 684993802297293100015001500140015001200776
Strato 699969765255211110010008801700160012001100
Trustdom 1200170015005276601500190019002800230020002200
WP Buzz 182237261193217351183365214157417286
WPX 423353296653739140013001600954150011001200
Z.com 20001600170014001700180033248573912002800955
Zone Media 694843721307419120013008521200130013001100

Discussion

WP Buzz had the fastest average and was the fastest in 8 of the 12 locations (Virginia, London, Singapore, Mumbai, Tokyo, Sydney, Brazil, and Dubai). AleForge had the second fastest average without winning any individual location. Pressable had the third fastest average. GoDaddy was the fastest in the other 4 locations (California, San Antonio TX, Frankfurt, and Cape Town) but came in fourth on the average — California (139ms) and Frankfurt (193ms) are very fast but Mumbai (2000ms) and Brazil (1600ms) pull the mean down.



Trustdom, Z.com, and Heart Internet had the three slowest averages. The chart can be adjusted by clicking on a company to remove outliers.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
20i 9.325375.3753754
34SP.com 16.259446.8275246
AleForge 17.77482.1600771
Bluehost 8.3964366.812227
DreamHost 8.682613.8735421
Fasthosts 8.824150.7840772
FullHost 5.751862.0689655
GoDaddy 24.519182.0167455
GreenGeeks 11.6951472.75405
Heart Internet 4.0683875.968992
HostArmada 13.142726.2164125
ICDSoft 26.779722.5433526
KnownHost 8.1731412.429379
Lightning Base 9.622580.7200929
mijn.host 11.462502.2601708
one.com 9.9251760.56338
Pressable 8.0911385.041551
Raidboxes 9.294755.2870091
Strato 9.057243.4274586
Trustdom 7.892447.2271914
WP Buzz 4.8813344.481605
WPX 7.819777.000777
Z.com 7.281647.2491909
Zone Media 6.6483039.513678

Discussion

Heart Internet had the fastest PHP Bench. WP Buzz was second and FullHost was third.

Bluehost had the fastest WP Bench. Heart Internet was second and WP Buzz was third.

WPBenchmark Score

WPBenchmark is a hosting performance benchmark that produces a single composite score per server. Higher is better.

Results Table

CompanyWPBenchmark Score
20i 4.9
34SP.com 5.9
AleForge 7.3
Bluehost 9.5
DreamHost 6.4
Fasthosts 5.9
FullHost 7.1
GoDaddy 5.4
GreenGeeks 5.2
Heart Internet 8.9
HostArmada 4.3
ICDSoft 6.2
KnownHost 5.1
Lightning Base 5.8
mijn.host 5.4
one.com 8.2
Pressable 8.3
Raidboxes 7.2
Strato 5.9
Trustdom 7
WP Buzz 9.9
WPX 6.6
Z.com 4.8
Zone Media 9.1

Discussion

WP Buzz led the WPBenchmark.io scores with a 9.9. Bluehost was second at 9.5 and Zone Media was third at 9.1.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
20i A
34SP.com A-
AleForge A+
Bluehost A
DreamHost A+
Fasthosts A-
FullHost A
GoDaddy A
GreenGeeks A+
Heart Internet A
HostArmada A+
ICDSoft A
KnownHost A
Lightning Base A
mijn.host A
one.com A
Pressable A+
Raidboxes A+
Strato A-
Trustdom A+
WP Buzz A
WPX A
Z.com A
Zone Media A

Discussion

No B grades at this tier this year.



34SP.com, Fasthosts, and Strato earned A-.



AleForge, DreamHost, GreenGeeks, HostArmada, Pressable, Raidboxes, and Trustdom earned A+.



Everyone else earned an A.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.


Individual Host Analysis

20i had a good LoadStorm test with only 1 error. The Static test averaged 13.3ms and was excellent. Uptime was 100% on HetrixTools and 99.99%+ on the other two. Honorable Mention this year.

Visit 20i Website

34SP.com had zero errors on the LoadStorm test with one tiny spike in an otherwise flat graph. The Static test was flat at 140ms average. Uptime was 100% on StatusCake and 99.98%+ on the others. Top Tier.

Visit 34SP.com Website

AleForge had near-perfect uptime (99.9996% / 100% / 100%), the third fastest Static test at this tier (6.3ms), and the second fastest GTmetrix average. SSL was A+. Unfortunately the LoadStorm test ran into trouble — things started to slow down around 300 VUsers and the error rate jumped around 500 VUsers, with 223,900 errors by the end. The errors were primarily 429s indicating a rate limit. The Static result was excellent on its own but the LoadStorm wall keeps AleForge out of award contention this year.

Visit AleForge Website

Bluehost had the fastest WP Bench at this tier by a significant margin and the second highest WPBenchmark.io (9.5). The LoadStorm test had flat response times across the board with only 8 errors. The Static test averaged 18.4ms and was almost flat. Uptime was 99.96%+ on all three monitors. Top Tier.

Visit Bluehost Website

DreamHost handled the LoadStorm test cleanly — caches warmed up and response times stayed flat with only 3 errors against 813k requests. The Static test averaged 125ms and was flat. UptimeKuma came in at 99.78% but the other two monitors agreed everything was fine — same value WPX shows across their tiers, points to monitor-side rather than real downtime. SSL was A+. Top Tier.

Visit DreamHost Website

Fasthosts had a perfectly flat Static test averaging 137ms. The LoadStorm test looked good for the first 20 minutes and then a security feature kicked in — likely a per-site resource limit — and the server stopped responding cleanly for the remainder (26,237 errors). HetrixTools also came in at 99.88%. The same shape on Strato (both are IONOS-owned) suggests the same platform policy. The LoadStorm cut-off keeps Fasthosts out of award contention.

Visit Fasthosts Website

FullHost had perfectly flat Static test response times at 114ms average and the third fastest PHP Bench at this tier. Uptime stayed above 99.97% on all three monitors. Unfortunately the LoadStorm test started struggling around 200 VUsers with response times jumping and errors kicking in around 550 VUsers (25,834 errors). The LoadStorm slow-down keeps FullHost out of award contention.

Visit FullHost Website

GoDaddy was the fastest in 4 of the 12 GTmetrix locations (California, San Antonio TX, Frankfurt, and Cape Town). The LoadStorm test was flat and quick with only 2 errors, including good login/page metrics. The Static test averaged 26ms — flat and fast with one tiny Singapore bump. Uptime was above 99.97% on all three monitors. Top Tier.

Visit GoDaddy Website

GreenGeeks handled the LoadStorm test with 18 errors against 527k requests — a few bumps but nothing major, response times stayed quick the entire test. The Static test averaged 130ms and was relatively flat with a couple of spikes. SSL was A+ and uptime was above 99.9% on all three monitors. Top Tier.

Visit GreenGeeks Website

Heart Internet had the fastest PHP Bench at this tier and the second fastest WP Bench. The LoadStorm test had flat response times at both macro and micro level with only 2 errors. The Static test averaged 250ms. Uptime was 100% on StatusCake and 99.98%+ on the other two. Honorable Mention.

Visit Heart Internet Website

HostArmada handled the LoadStorm test with only 9 errors against 786k requests. The graph was mostly flat with multiple large spikes where response times jumped substantially before settling back. The Static test averaged 110ms and was flat. Uptime stayed above 99.98% on all three monitors. SSL was A+. Honorable Mention.

Visit HostArmada Website

ICDSoft handled the LoadStorm test with 28 errors against 556k requests — one early spike and then flat. The Static test averaged 129ms and was flat after the initial uncached hit. Uptime was above 99.98% on all three monitors. Top Tier.

Visit ICDSoft Website

KnownHost handled the LoadStorm test with zero errors. The 5-minute cron spike pattern is visible through the run, and around 850 VUsers the third cron event turned into sustained elevated response times for the rest of the test. The Static test averaged 124ms with some cron-related spikes and jitter but overall looked good. Uptime was above 99.97% on all three monitors. The LoadStorm degradation under sustained load kept KnownHost out of award contention this year.

Visit KnownHost Website

Lightning Base had perfect uptime on HetrixTools and StatusCake and effectively perfect (99.9988%) on UptimeKuma. The LoadStorm test was excellent with flat response times and zero errors — a 5-minute cron is visible in the drill-down but the performance impact is minimal. The Static test averaged 111ms and was just flat. Top Tier.

Visit Lightning Base Website

mijn.host had a Static test averaging 12.2ms and flat. Uptime was 99.91%+ on all three monitors. Unfortunately the LoadStorm test started fine and then wp-login was just blocked and stopped responding — looks like a security measure that couldn't be worked around (12,621 errors). The blocked login portion keeps mijn.host out of award contention this year.

Visit mijn.host Website

one.com had a tough LoadStorm test — 66,157 errors against just 67,548 requests, essentially the server gave up early. The Static test averaged 217ms but 75,716 of 77,854 requests errored — the responses that did return came back quickly, most just didn't return. The graphs were oddly beautiful when you drill in but the underlying error counts don't earn recognition this year. Uptime was the bright spot at 99.97%+ across all three monitors.

Visit one.com Website

Pressable was the only company at this tier with 100% across all three monitors. The LoadStorm test was flat and fast on overall and in-depth metrics with zero errors. The Static test had the fastest average response time at this tier — 5.1ms — where the "spikes" are at 6ms because the average is so low. GTmetrix had Pressable third on average. SSL was A+. Another consistent Top Tier from Pressable.

Visit Pressable Website

Raidboxes had near-perfect uptime (above 99.99% on all three monitors), zero errors on the LoadStorm test, and an A+ SSL. The first noticeable spike happened around 600 VUsers and the test became less stable around 900 VUsers. The Static test averaged 328ms with one spike and a sustained slow-down around 580 VUsers. The instability under load keeps Raidboxes out of award contention at this tier.

Visit Raidboxes Website

Strato had an incredibly flat Static test averaging 136ms. The LoadStorm test went well until security measures throttled performance and the test was all errors from that point (37,610 errors). Same shape on Fasthosts (both IONOS-owned). Uptime was above 99.97% on all three monitors. The LoadStorm cut-off keeps Strato out of award contention.

Visit Strato Website

Trustdom had uptime above 99.96% on all three monitors and an A+ SSL. The LoadStorm test had security measures blocking wp-login (78,762 errors), which keeps the dynamic result from earning recognition. The Static test slowed down through the run with an average of 2.9 seconds. Not a year that earned recognition.

Visit Trustdom Website

WP Buzz had the second fastest PHP Bench at this tier (4.88s, behind Heart Internet at 4.07s), the third fastest WP Bench, and the highest WPBenchmark.io (9.9). On GTmetrix they had the fastest average and 8 of the 12 location wins. The LoadStorm test was flat with zero errors and only end-of-test cron-related spikes. The Static test averaged 6.9ms. Uptime was 100% on HetrixTools and 99.99%+ on the other two. Top Tier.

Visit WP Buzz Website

WPX had the second fastest Static test at this tier — 5.9ms average that drops to 4.16ms once cached, the uncached cold hit pulls up the average. The LoadStorm test was flat and fast with zero errors. UptimeKuma came in at 99.78% (the same number across their other tiers, monitor-side issue) but HetrixTools was 100% and StatusCake 99.91%. Top Tier.

Visit WPX Website

Z.com had a tough year. The LoadStorm test had 37,652 errors against 43,335 requests — the server slowed down and stopped responding. The Static test averaged 5.8 seconds with the same slow-down. Uptime was above 99.9% on all three monitors but the rest of the testing didn't earn recognition this year.

Visit Z.com Website

Zone Media had the third highest WPBenchmark.io (9.1) — the hardware looks fast. Unfortunately a rate-limit/security measure kicked in on the LoadStorm test and the graph went from flat to all errors immediately (6.6M errors against 6.7M requests). Same story on the Static test. Uptime was 100% on StatusCake and 99.97%+ on the others. The security wall keeps Zone Media out of award contention this year — the underlying hardware looks strong enough for recognition if the security configuration could be adjusted for synthetic testing.

Visit Zone Media Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

Want updates sent to your email?

Subscribe to our Newsletter