Enterprise ($500+/Month) WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2020
Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.
Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.
Originally posted here.
LoadStorm Testing Results
Load Storm is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.
Results Table
Company | Total Requests | Total Errors | Peak Rps | Average Rps | Peak Response Time | Average Response Time | Total Data Transferred | Peak Throughput | Average Throughput | Wp-login Average Response Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flywheel | 2043029 | 218 | 1644.77 | 1135.02 | 2239 | 101 | 112.42 | 90.44 | 62.46 | 797 |
GridPane.com | 2071182 | 3 | 1652 | 1151 | 15069 | 85.00 | 112.27 | 90 | 62 | 825 |
Pantheon | 1934443 | 252 | 1548 | 1075 | 27699 | 105.00 | 120.86 | 97 | 67 | 1002 |
Pressable | 2339016 | 5 | 1887 | 1299 | 15099 | 114.00 | 120.53 | 97 | 67 | 1005 |
Presslabs | 2313006 | 0 | 1867 | 1285 | 5763.00 | 198.00 | 112 | 91 | 62 | 1310 |
Scaleforce powered by Jelastic | 2231688 | 495 | 1782 | 1240 | 15103 | 111.00 | 117.82 | 94 | 65 | 1428 |
Seravo | 2017026 | 6 | 1647.15 | 1120.57 | 13379 | 106 | 105.21 | 86.17 | 58.45 | 804 |
Servebolt | 2707825 | 250 | 2180 | 1504 | 15289 | 64.00 | 101.02 | 80 | 56 | 881 |
WordPress VIP | 1968726 | 3 | 1581.05 | 1093.74 | 3821 | 109 | 165.96 | 133.41 | 92.2 | 804 |
Discussion
Flywheel, GridPane, Jelastic, Pantheon, Pressable, Presslabs, Seravo, Servebolt and WPVIP all handled this test without issue. It's impressive how the average response time for every company was below 200ms.
K6 Static Testing Results
K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.
Results Table
Company | Requests | Errors | Peak Rps | Average Response Time | Average Rps | P95 | P99 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flywheel | 2055993 | 3 | |||||
GridPane.com | 1692853 | 0 | |||||
Pantheon | 2033313 | 3 | |||||
Pressable | 2193045 | 0 | |||||
Presslabs | 1909394 | 1 | |||||
Scaleforce powered by Jelastic | 2003605 | 9 | |||||
Seravo | 2022325 | 0 | |||||
Servebolt | 1703187 | 0 | |||||
WordPress VIP | 2146954 | 0 |
Discussion
No company struggled with the Load Impact test. Jelastic had a very strange looking graph with response times bouncing up and down, possibly an auto scaling issue? GridPane's graph looked like there was an increasing in load but the peak was under 300ms, it really isn't an issue.
Uptime Testing Results
Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.
Results Table
Company | Uptime Robot | Hetrix | Alt Uptime Monitor |
---|---|---|---|
Flywheel | 100 | 100 | |
GridPane.com | 100 | 100 | |
Pantheon | 100 | 100 | |
Pressable | 100 | 100 | |
Presslabs | 100 | 100 | |
Scaleforce powered by Jelastic | 99.979 | 99.99 | |
Seravo | 99.984 | 100 | |
Servebolt | 99.581 | 100 | 99.99 |
WordPress VIP | 100 | 100 |
Discussion
No companies had any uptime issues.
Servebolt also had a discrepancy between UptimeRobot and StatusCake uptime. One showed a very low 99.581 and the other 100. The third monitor I setup showed 99.99%, so I went with the StatusCake number.
WebPageTest Testing Results
WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.
Results Table
Company | Virginia | California | London | Frankfurt | Singapore | Mumbai | Tokyo | Sydney | Brazil | Average | Rose Hill Mauritius | Israel |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flywheel | 0.351 | 0.433 | 0.352 | 0.353 | 0.371 | 0.417 | 0.41 | 0.439 | 0.381 | 0.4995833333 | 1.058 | 0.91 |
GridPane.com | 0.45 | 0.783 | 1.054 | 1.032 | 2.091 | 2.443 | 1.581 | 2.161 | 1.179 | 1.451916667 | 2.321 | 1.547 |
Pantheon | 0.472 | 0.569 | 0.61 | 0.632 | 0.885 | 0.988 | 1.006 | 0.954 | 0.688 | 0.9871666667 | 3.26 | 1.13 |
Pressable | 0.473 | 0.957 | 1.238 | 1.172 | 2.309 | 2.039 | 1.85 | 2.335 | 1.322 | 1.654666667 | 3.217 | 2.027 |
Presslabs | 0.66 | 0.854 | 0.369 | 0.389 | 0.367 | 0.565 | 0.604 | 0.468 | 1.556 | 0.7021666667 | 1.102 | 0.881 |
Scaleforce powered by Jelastic | 0.634 | 0.92 | 0.325 | 0.419 | 1.316 | 0.847 | 1.632 | 1.506 | 1.131 | 1.114166667 | 2.522 | 1.048 |
Seravo | 0.342 | 0.401 | 0.46 | 0.345 | 0.527 | 0.57 | 0.368 | 0.438 | 0.35 | 0.5310833333 | 1.02 | 0.973 |
Servebolt | 0.426 | 0.645 | 0.639 | 0.671 | 1.053 | 0.99 | 0.847 | 1.065 | 0.784 | 0.8994166667 | 1.769 | 1.213 |
WordPress VIP | 0.421 | 0.531 | 0.704 | 0.722 | 1.618 | 1.451 | 1.037 | 1.271 | 0.698 | 0.989 | 1.593 | 1.16 |
Discussion
Flywheel and Seravo were neck and neck with Flywheel edging out Seravo by 31ms for fastest average load time. Pressable was the slowest in 7/12 locations.
WPPerformanceTester Testing Results
WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.
Results Table
Company | PHP Bench | WP Bench |
---|---|---|
Flywheel | 8.852 | 357.1428571 |
GridPane.com | 6.093 | 923 |
Pantheon | 11.098 | 226.3980077 |
Pressable | 6.284 | 1344.086022 |
Presslabs | 6.712 | 1242.236025 |
Scaleforce powered by Jelastic | 7.524 | 314.861461 |
Seravo | 6.12 | 820.3445447 |
Servebolt | 3.292 | 2037 |
WordPress VIP | 9.875 | 854.7008547 |
Discussion
Servebolt stood out being the fastest PHP Bench and WP Bench. GridPane, Pressable, Presslabs and Seravo all had faster PHP bench scores than the second fastest company last year (Presslabs); so it's nice to see the whole field getting faster.
*GridPane.com couldn't run the WPPerformanceTester plugin because of the database layer they run wasn't compatible (LudicrousDB). The same commands were executed manually that the WPPerformanceTester does against the system to replicate the numbers.
SSL Testing Results
The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/
Results Table
Company | Qualsys SSL Grade |
---|---|
Flywheel | A |
GridPane.com | A+ |
Pantheon | A+ |
Pressable | A |
Presslabs | A+ |
Scaleforce powered by Jelastic | A |
Seravo | A+ |
Servebolt | B |
WordPress VIP | A |
Discussion
GridPane, Pantheon, Presslabs and Seravo all earned A+ ratings. Every single B grade was for the following reason according to Qualsys: "This server supports TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. Grade capped to B."
Conclusion
There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.
Top Tier
This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.
Flywheel
GridPane.com
Pantheon
Pressable
Presslabs
Scaleforce powered by Jelastic
Seravo
Servebolt
WordPress VIP
Honorable Mention
The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.
No company achieved this status.