$201-500/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

$201-500/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Servebolt submitted two plans, Business and Pro+Accelerated Domains (ACD).

Cloudways competed with a GCP CO 2XL instance.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
Cloudways $397Unlimited 32 GB RAM, 8 vCPU20 GB2 GBUnlimited
Nexcess $299UnlimitedN/A300 GB5 TB50
Pressable $3501000000512 MB/PHP process200 GBUnlimited50
Servebolt $349UnlimitedUnlimited40 GBUnmetered server bandwidth. 100 GB CDN bandwidth.25
Servebolt Pro+ACD $481UnlimitedUnlimited16 GB1 TB CDN Bandwidth 5
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Wp-login Average Response TimePage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum Avg
Cloudways 8214937705.754464255123119331971192
Nexcess 103078317871.5856029925021731245
Pressable 11327061974.7561525118018018187
Servebolt 1257669111042.3368426519125621278
Servebolt Pro+ACD 125950371044.9268426918821524217

Discussion

Nexcess, Pressable, and both Servebolt plans handled this test without any issues.

Cloudways started slowing down around 2300 VUsers.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
Cloudways 162069403569.671111779217
Nexcess 177650823915.8314195022
Pressable 179193703944.335.3196712
Servebolt 176577913883.8320193828
Servebolt Pro+ACD 174825943859.3330191941

Discussion

Every company handled the static test almost perfect. There was a decrease in average and p95 response times from every company that participated in the previous year. Cloudways went from 212/489 to 111/217 [Avg/p95]. Nexcess went from 248/473 to 14/22. Pressable went from 5.9/19 to 5.3/12. Servebolt went from 176/283 + 37/50 to 20/28 + 30/41. It shows the companies which were slower last year saw the biggest gains, but even the fastest companies continue to speed up.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
Cloudways 100100
Nexcess 10099.9909
Pressable 100100
Servebolt 10099.9941
Servebolt Pro+ACD 10099.9972

Discussion

Perfect uptime on Uptime Robot for everyone and nobody was below 99.99% on Hetrix Tools.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
Cloudways 20346239950957813301190120087311486761171812
Nexcess 2834824334659211005114111467731120636941779
Pressable 2733033842782981534263726291282390386451
Servebolt 227355448323388218753865375465210240406
Servebolt Pro+ACD 256440652442324248749442415223498296415

Discussion

Servebolt was the fastest average with 406ms with 3/12 fastest locations.

Servebolt ACD followed close behind for second at 415ms average and 2/12 fastest locations.

Pressable was third fastest average with 451ms with 6/12 fastest locations

Cloudways was the fastest in Virginia.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
Cloudways 7.161873.3624454
Nexcess 6.2972512.562814
Pressable 9.681647.446458
Servebolt 4.2334716.981132
Servebolt Pro+ACD 4.2274464.285714

Discussion

Servebolt had the fastest PHP bench and WP Bench scores by a significant margin. Servebolt run a patched version of MariaDB whereas the default version performs AES_ENCRYPT() function slower. I debated changing the plugin before I was aware it was patchable, but considering it is something fixable, I opted not to change it this year.

Nexcess had an incredibly fast WP Bench, the fastest of any WP Bench this year for a company not named Servebolt.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
Cloudways A
Nexcess A
Pressable A
Servebolt A+
Servebolt Pro+ACD A+

Discussion

Everyone got an A with Servebolt earning two A+'s.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.

No company achieved this status.


Individual Host Analysis

Cloudways handled the Static test flawlessly with no errors or signs of load and a quick 111ms average response time. Cloudways also had perfect uptime. Cloudways even picked up the fastest response time in Virginia on WPT. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test proved a little much with the server slowing down around 2300 users. This was a dramatic improvement over last year where issues started around 900 users and it errored out. It's nice to see a lot of improvement, but there's definitely a little more work left to be done.
Visit Cloudways Website
Nexcess earned Top Tier last year but the performance didn't stand out against its peers. The improvement this year was dramatic with Load Storm's p95 going from 509 down to 299. The Static test saw an even more dramatic drop from 248ms average to 14ms and 473ms to 22ms for the p95. The Static results were the second fastest this year from being in the slowest the previous year. Nexcess had 100% and 99.99%+ uptime. The PHP and WP Bench scores from Nexcess would be the fastest of any company this year except Servebolt. It's nice to see a Top Tier performer improve considerably and earn another Top Tier award.
Visit Nexcess Website
Pressable had a fantastic Load Storm test where it led every response time metric (p95, wp-login, Page, Asset, Login). Pressable also led the average and p95 response times on the Static test. Pressable had perfect uptime on both monitors. Despite having the third fastest WPT average, it led in 6/12 locations as the fastest. Pressable was unquestionably Top Tier this year.
Visit Pressable Website
Servebolt's Business plan compared fairly similarly to it's Pro+ACD variant. The Load Storm test saw Servebolt earn second fastest p95 and Asset response times; along with third fastest wp-login response time. Servebolt aced the static test with 20ms average and 28ms p95. The Uptime was 100% and 99.99%+. This Servebolt plan also had the fastest average WPT speed and led in 3/12 locations. Servebolt's plans ran away in PHP/WP Bench scores posting the highest numbers we've seen to date this year. The SSL test earned an A+. The test results were excellent for Servebolt, yet again, and they find themselves earning another Top Tier award.
Visit Servebolt Website
Servebolt Pro+ACD handled the Load Storm test effortlessly. It had the second fastest wp-login, Page, and Login; as well as the third fastest p95, and Asset response times. The Static test was easy as well with Servebolt clocking in 30ms average and 41ms p95 response times. Uptime was 100% and 99.99%+. Servebolt Pro+ACD had the second fastest WPT average and was the fastest in 2/12 locations. Servebolt ran away in PHP/WP Bench scores posting the highest numbers we've seen to date this year. Add in an A+ SSL for good measure. Yet another Top Tier performance for Servebolt.
Visit Servebolt Pro+ACD Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

WooCommerce Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

WooCommerce Hosting Performance Benchmarks is spawned off WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks and is designed to create a consistent set of benchmarks showing how WooCommerce specialized web hosting companies perform. The focus of these tests is performancenot support, not features, not any other dimension. These benchmarks should be looked at in combination with other sources of information when making any hosting decision. Review Signal’s web hosting reviews has insights for some of the companies with regards to aspects beyond performance. That said, for the performance conscious, these benchmarks should be a good guide.

The major differences from the WordPress methodology are the following:

Setup

All tests were performed on an identical WooCommerce dummy website with the same plugins except in cases where hosts added extra plugins or code. The Storefront theme was used with the following sample products. The following Plugins were installed: WooCommerce,  and WP Performance Tester.

k6 Load Storm

The process for LoadStorm was the unique WooCommerce specific test emulated from last year into k6. There were four different profiles created and given their own user distributions (in % after profile), all with 5-10 second page think time. The test scaled from 4 to 1000 concurrent users over 40 minutes and stayed at 1,000 concurrent users for 20 minutes (60 minute test, 20 minute peak).

Profile 1 (20%): Buyer – Homepage, add item to cart, go to cart, checkout (doesn’t submit order)

Profile 2 (10%): Customer (existing) – Homepage, login, view orders, view account details

Profile 3 (20%): Browser – Homepage, visit 5 random product pages

Profile 4 (50%): Home – Homepage only

Source files available here: https://github.com/ReviewSignal/k6-WordPress-benchmarks

k6 Static

Followed the $51-100/Month Price Tier with load going from 1-2000 users over 15 minutes.

Notes

Cloudways was run using DigitalOcean 8GB Premium Droplet.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
Blallo 90UnlimitedCustom/At least 4 GB35+ GBUnmetered1
Cloudways $96Unlimited8 GB RAM, 4 vCPU160 GB NVMe5 TBUnlimited
GreenGeeks $25.95Unlimited3 GBUnlimitedUnmeteredUnlimited
Nexcess $79UnlimitedN/A60 GB5 TB3
Pressable $4550000512 MB/PHP process30 GBUnlimited3
Presslabs $9990,000 page views1.5 GB90 GBUnmetered1
Seravo 60 EUR1,500,000 HTTP req10 GB+30 GB2 Gbps+1
Servebolt $99UnlimitedUnlimited10 GBUnmetered server bandwidth 100 GB CDN bandwidth5
SiteGround $39.99400,000 Recommendationn/a40 GBunlimited trafficUnlimited
WordPress.com $45UnlimitedN/A200 GBUnlimited1
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Wp-login Average Response TimePage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum AvgWoo Buyer ProfileWoo Customer ProfileWoo Browser ProfileWoo Home ProfileWoo Cart Response Cumavg
Blallo 540710133218.141501119570172444717137513837671019571
Cloudways 36091856167854.11001753576511870583347072278320095142711727911771
GreenGeeks 5203492219.86144459219244215277463413413459229
Nexcess 5495703227.915245325676228286543493279395276
Pressable 5606180231.5215532721264176260413361240313219
Presslabs 5611361233.1915530517768144190447407179271178
Seravo 5489660226.81152383186175177203519299445287190
Servebolt 5592912234.5215538318085156286421477246273189
SiteGround 5416381225.48150631322102334402715671373619398
WordPress.com 5245220218.48145695423134387482967643467563446

Discussion

GreenGeeks, Nexcess, Pressable, Presslabs, Seravo, Servebolt, SiteGround, and WordPress.com didn't have any issues.

Blallo started to show signs of load around 850 users and response times slowed down. It kept delivering, but it slowed down enough to keep it out of earning recognition.

Cloudways started slowing down around 350 VUsers with errors kicking in around 1,000.

Load Storm Average Response Time by Profile

This takes deeper look at the results and analyzes the performance of loading HTML mime types, to ignore a lot of static assets which are cached and bring down average response times. This tests how fast the initial pages are delivered, which is what a user would experience before loading all the other assets like css, javascript and images.

Results Table

CompanyBuyer ProfileCustomer ProfileBrowser ProfileHome ProfileCart Response Cumavg
Blallo 137513837671019571
Cloudways 2278320095142711727911771
GreenGeeks 463413413459229
Nexcess 543493279395276
Pressable 413361240313219
Presslabs 447407179271178
Seravo 519299445287190
Servebolt 421477246273189
SiteGround 715671373619398
WordPress.com 967643467563446

Cloudways stands out with the highest response times.

Blallo had the second highest response times across every profile.

Presslabs had 2/4 of the fastest profiles along with fastest cart speed.

Pressable and Seravo picked up the two other fastest profile scores.

Servebolt was the second fastest in 2/4 profiles and 2nd fastest cart speed.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
Blallo 87428511934.833096038
Cloudways 80259301776.33122881230
GreenGeeks 80151301769123881231
Nexcess 88752631956.51597422
Pressable 89569901970.175.598314
Presslabs 88630101951.171697452
Seravo 79708401746.33130875265
Servebolt 88169711934.832194829
SiteGround 880768019452396877
WordPress.com 89461401976.56.798214

Discussion

Every single company handled the static test well. The entire cohort saw a combined 5 errors total which is astonishingly low. The highest average response time was 130ms which is still quite fast. Pressable and WordPress.com both were single digit average response times with 5 other companies following with 30ms or lower right behind them (Nexcess, Presslabs, Servebolt, SiteGround, Blallo).

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
Blallo 100100
Cloudways 10099.9991
GreenGeeks 10099.9931
Nexcess 10099.9849
Pressable 100100
Presslabs 100100
Seravo 10099.9959
Servebolt 10099.9927
SiteGround 10099.9987
WordPress.com 100100

Discussion

Uptime Robot showed 100% uptime on every single company. HetrixTools showed above 99.9% on every company. Not a single company had uptime issues during this test.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
Blallo 51064793892710503751819188062512401018469958.1666667
Cloudways 42988578192498621132145212015992142112420001437.333333
GreenGeeks 235350402499586117210511082768966688961730
Nexcess 7219831017104711287481437155711551878103218591213.5
Pressable 560700771673678813158110368566596501212849.0833333
Presslabs 53157976855956014424886544726035301242702.3333333
Seravo 5947397631039111420382087194015981881132121561439.166667
Servebolt 52761196165368577213298684937535231318791.0833333
SiteGround 6745818651350102117415563600104059056517141191.416667
WordPress.com 517697964573665965639606623698558601675.5

Discussion

WordPress.com was the fastest this year on average but only was the fastest in Mumbai.

Presslabs earned itself second fastest average with 3/12 locations showing it to be the fastest.

Last year's fastest GreenGeeks, improved their average from 773ms to 730ms, a 43ms improvement. It was the fastest in 4/12 locations. The field continued to get faster and it only earned third this year on average response time.

SiteGround had the fastest in Sydney, Servebolt in Brazil, Blallo in Dubai and Cape Town.


Everyone, especially consumers, looks like a winner given the historical context.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
Blallo 12.617656.5988181
Cloudways 9.182542.0054201
GreenGeeks 9.3931926.782274
Nexcess 7.9651745.200698
Pressable 9.6971689.189189
Presslabs 6.9351109.877913
Seravo 8.931314.7623544
Servebolt 4.224672.897196
SiteGround 8.8251329.787234
WordPress.com 9.4542325.581395

Discussion

Servebolt had the fastest PHP bench and WP Bench scores by a significant margin. Servebolt run a patched version of MariaDB whereas the default version performs AES_ENCRYPT() function slower. I debated changing the plugin before I was aware it was patchable, but considering it is something fixable, I opted not to change it this year.

Presslabs and then Nexcess had the second and third fastest PHP bench scores. Then the field becomes pretty close with Blallo in the rear.

The WP Bench scores were much more distributed with WordPress.com and GreenGeeks taking second and third respectively.

Seravo had the slowest WP Bench but operates in a cluster, which is a good reminder that WPPerformanceTester is single threaded. Which is why it's a nice piece of information but doesn't necessarily determine real world performance.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
Blallo B
Cloudways A
GreenGeeks A+
Nexcess A
Pressable A+
Presslabs A
Seravo A+
Servebolt A+
SiteGround A
WordPress.com A+

Discussion

GreenGeeks, Pressable, Seravo, Servebolt and WordPress.com all earned A+'s.

Cloudways, Nexcess, Presslabs, and SiteGround earned A's.

Blallo earned a B.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.

No company achieved this status.


Individual Host Analysis

Blallo was a new entrant this year and had a pretty good first showing in these difficult tests. The static test was handled near perfect with an average response time of 30ms and a single error in roughly 875,000 requests. Blallo also maintained perfect uptime with both monitors showing 100%. They also had the fastest WPT response time in Dubai and Cape Town. The Load Storm test created a little too much load and the server started to slow down noticeably around 850 users. It didn't fail or error out, but response times started creeping up for the remainder of the test. Overall, Blallo definitely had some bright spots and hopefully earns itself some recognition in the coming years.
Visit Blallo Website
Cloudways's static test was excellent with zero errors and a flat response time. It had perfect and 99.9991% uptime. The Load Storm test was a struggle again this year, Cloudways showed some signs of improvement over last year. Overall, it's trending the right direction and handling the test better. Unfortunately, it still needs to improve more to earn some recognition in these benchmarks.
Visit Cloudways Website
GreenGeeks handled the Load Storm test without issue. It didn't stand out in any particular category but it was performed solidly without any issues. The static test wasn't an issue for GreenGeeks either, the response time was completely flat with 0 errors. GreenGeeks had 100%/99.99%+ uptime. GreenGeeks had the fastest response times in 4/12 locations in the WPT test and improved the average response time from 773ms to 730ms this year. Despite being the fastest last year and improving this year, it was the third fastest average on WPT. GreenGeeks also had the third fastest WP Bench score. Overall, GreenGeeks saw some improvements and maintained their Top Tier status as the cheapest plan in the tests, well done.
Visit GreenGeeks Website
Nexcess saw tremendous improvement over their 2022 WooCommerce performance. Last year the Load Storm test overwhelmed them, this year's performance was a night and day difference. Nexcess even earned the third fastest Page speed this year. The improvements didn't just stop there, the Static test went from 297ms average last year to 15ms this year. Nexcess earned the third fastest average and p95 speeds on the Static test. Nexcess showed 100% and 99.98% on the uptime monitors. Nexcess went from struggling to handling this test well and even starting to compete for the fastest results, it's nice to see companies improve their performance so much between years. It's a pleasure to award Nexcess their first Top Tier recognition for the WooCommerce benchmark.
Visit Nexcess Website
Pressable had an excellent showing this year. The Load Storm test had no errors, flat response times, the second fastest P95, the fastest Page load times, fastest Buyer profile, and second fastest customer+browser profile. Pressable did flawlessly on the static test with zero errors again, the fastest average and p95 (tie) response times. Throw in perfect uptime on both monitors and giving Pressable Top Tier status this year was an easy choice.
Visit Pressable Website
This was Presslabs's first time entering the WooCommerce benchmark. They've regularly earned Top Tier recognition in the WordPress benchmarks. Their first foray into the WooCommerce benchmark did not disappoint. Presslabs had the fastest P95, wp-login, asset, login, Browser profile, Home profile and Woo Cart response times. It also had the second fastest Page, and third fastest Buyer profile and Customer profile response times. The Static results were also blazingly fast with a 16ms average and 52ms p95 response times. Perfect uptime on both monitors. The second fastest average on the WPT test with the fastest score in 3/12 locations. Presslabs also had the second fastest PHP Bench score. Overall, Presslabs had an undeniably Top Tier performance for their first WooCommerce benchmark.
Visit Presslabs Website
Seravo returned to the benchmarks after taking a year off. The break seems to have paid off as Seravo has earned their first Top Tier award for the WooCommerce benchmark. The Load Storm test didn't show a hint of load and didn't have a single error. Seravo clocked the fastest fastest customer profile, second fastest login cumulative average, and third fastest p95, wp-login speed, woo cart response time, and home profile. The static test went fine for Seravo, it had the slowest average response time, but that time was a very snappy 130ms with zero errors. Seravo also had 100%/99.99%+ uptime scores. Seravo had the slowest WPT average. It received an A+ grade from the SSL test. Overall, it was a massive improvement for Seravo. It earned Top Tier status because it handled the load tests quickly and without showing signs of performance degradation.
Visit Seravo Website
Servebolt's servers came roaring in with the fastest PHP and WP bench scores we've seen to date this year. The Load Storm test went effortlessly with Servebolt had the second fastest wp-login / Asset Loading / Buyer Profile / Home Profile / Woo Cart Response. It also had the third fastest P95 / Browser profile. The Static test was excellent as well with a 21ms average and 29ms p95. They also achieved perfect uptime and 99.99%+ on each uptime monitor. Servebolt had the fastest WPT response time in Brazil to boot. Servebolt easily achieves another Top Tier honor this year.
Visit Servebolt Website
SiteGround handled the Load Storm test smoothly with a single error and flat response times. It wasn't the fastest in any metric but the results were good. The static test saw SiteGround achieve an excellent 23ms average without a single error. Uptime was 100% / 99.99%+. SiteGround was the fastest average response time in Sydney on the WPT. Overall, SiteGround handled all the tests very well; it was mostly in the middle of the pack, but the pack has become very fast. Considering it was the second cheapest plan in this test, it looks like a great result and earned a well deserved Top Tier award.
Visit SiteGround Website
WordPress.com handled the Load Storm test very well. There were zero errors. There was the slightest hint of rising response times over the test with page response times increasing ~15ms over the duration and login response times going up ~60ms. But those slight response times kept WordPress.com out of being the fastest in any statistical categories this year. WordPress.com however did shine in the static test where it had a 6.7ms average response time which was the second fastest only slower than sister company Pressable - who they tied for first with on the P95 at 14ms. They also had perfect 100% uptime on both monitors. WordPress.com managed the fastest average speed on WPT. Overall, it's pretty obviously a Top Tier performance again.
Visit WordPress.com Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

Enterprise ($500+/Month) WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

The Enterprise tier of these benchmarks is special in that companies are allowed to change configurations to optimize for performance because at this price tier it’s expected for customers paying a lot of money. All other price tiers test default configurations.

Servebolt submitted two plans, the Scale + ACD plan is utilizing their Scale and Accelerated Domains addon which adds performance, scalability and security enhancements and their Enterprise Plan.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
A2 Hosting $749.99Unlimited128 GB2 TB15 TBUnlimited
Altis Cloud $2000+200M+ per yearN/AUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited sites and domains via Multisite
Blallo 1,000€UnlimitedCustom35 GB+Unmetered1
Performant Websites $595+Unlimited static requests, Starts at 1M dynamic requests.16 GB Starting30 GB Starting1 TB Starting1+
Pressable $5451600000512 MB/PHP process275 GBUnlimited80
Presslabs $1,8906 million page views32 GBUnmeteredUnmeteredUnmetered
Rocket.net $649unlimited64 GB800 GB1 TBUnlimited
Seravo 150 EUR +unlimited / based on contract10 GB +60 GB+2 Gbps+1
Servebolt $3000+UnlimitedUnlimitedCustomCustomCustom
Servebolt Scale+ACD $998UnlimitedUnlimited100 GB1 TB CDN Bandwidth 75
Stoute Web Solutions $1,250Unlimited64 GB960 GB (Shared with Server OS)Unlimited1
WordPress VIP $2,000 MinimumUnlimitedOptimized per siteOptimized per siteOptimized per site1 application, but easy to add additional applications
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Wp-login Average Response TimePage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum Avg
A2 Hosting 206644733631740.581123254314391254911415
Altis Cloud 230489901893.08124938568532813394
Blallo 2000310291664.25108729519217359208
Performant Websites 17893361291449.17972353174193178203
Pressable 226478401865.5123024818118118188
Presslabs 230534801908125319714714711152
Rocket.net 1860302121524.751010313193160130168
Seravo 47471395770864684.832580715271227218223
Servebolt 225038051906.83122233118129022191
Servebolt Scale+ACD 2248073121880.33122233518330222196
Stoute Web Solutions 1820084511514.598936519721595222
WordPress VIP 183806741503.5899827517718215193

Discussion

Blallo, Performant Websites, Pressable, Presslabs, Rocket.net, Servebolt (both), Stoute Web Solutions, and WordPress VIP all handled this test without issue.

Altis Cloud had a strange pattern where performance has the initial cold start spike and becomes fast quickly, but then slowed down early in the test, but then improves and stabilizes for the remainder of the test. I've don't recall seeing this pattern before and was told it was caching related. Overall, it the system handled the max load without issue, but saw some strange spikes while scaling up.

Seravo ran into issues handling this test, it was an issue they were actively working on a fix for but it wasn't deployed in time before the testing for these benchmarks finished. It was related to a proxy running into issues when certain conditions were met which caused connections to stay open.

A2Hosting started to slow down around 4250 users.


K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
A2 Hosting 223014022549305.4245113
Altis Cloud 224140804950.834.5246011
Blallo 220368984872.6722234429
Performant Websites 220241251484622241833
Pressable 223987004958.675.2246113
Presslabs 222944804931.3310244727
Rocket.net 220395144869.522242231
Seravo 201617804445.51172213227
Servebolt 2179221194798.1733235643
Servebolt Scale+ACD 21793169480133239243
Stoute Web Solutions 220360824866.8322242229
WordPress VIP 223915504925.55.7245813

Discussion

Every company handled this test very well. Seravo stood out at the bottom without a CDN, but still had an incredibly fast 117ms average. Excluding Seravo, every company was 33ms average or below and 43ms p95 or below. Compared to last year where the fastest average was 6.4 ms and p95 was 20ms. There are four companies this year below both of those levels. The performance at the Enterprise tier is mind bogglingly fast and getting even faster which is hard to comprehend when last year's 6.4ms was beaten by 4 plans this year.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
A2 Hosting 100100
Altis Cloud 100100
Blallo 100100
Performant Websites 98.16999.9995
Pressable 100100
Presslabs 100100
Rocket.net 100100
Seravo 99.99999.9972
Servebolt 99.699.6966
Servebolt Scale+ACD 10099.9972
Stoute Web Solutions 99.90999.9279
WordPress VIP 100100

Discussion

Every company except Performant Websites and Servebolt had above 99.9% uptime on both monitors. Both of those companies had issues with the uptime monitor being blocked by security measures when the servers weren't actually down. Effectively, none of these companies had any uptime issues.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
A2 Hosting 195207853207681207205276425321561210362
Altis Cloud 215206299253240190486234246271247144253
Blallo 2152183562306232321279222226971227267422
Performant Websites 422290388390456504954850375506852959579
Pressable 2682694014543191541453259530331268376456
Presslabs 211222329228232967217199221194220258292
Rocket.net 178234274174177142167187163173167211187
Seravo 28634529860765012691222119891610218001182816
Servebolt 248207497202191174685206164228179244269
Servebolt Scale+ACD 277334441198187187550177780176192224310
Stoute Web Solutions 229248611533550238118817732281004706269631
WordPress VIP 188213295184217861205206205212199232268

Discussion

Rocket.net had the fastest average at 187ms and was the fastest in 9/12 locations. Rocket Intelligent Edge looks to be paying off on the results here.

Altis picked up the second fastest average at 253ms and was the fastest in California and Dubai.

Servebolt Scale+ACD picked up the final fastest time in Mumbai.

WordPress VIP had the third fastest average.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
A2 Hosting 12.5761347.708895
Altis Cloud 11.484230.5741296
Blallo 10.575669.3440428
Performant Websites 10.252651.8904824
Pressable 9.6811692.047377
Presslabs 6.6031388.888889
Rocket.net 6.9422079.002079
Seravo 8.932302.1148036
Servebolt 4.2224444.444444
Servebolt Scale+ACD 4.2154629.62963
Stoute Web Solutions 7.441919.385797
WordPress VIP 10.533703.7297678

Discussion

Servebolt had the fastest PHP bench and WP Bench scores by a significant margin. Servebolt run a patched version of MariaDB whereas the default version performs AES_ENCRYPT() function slower. I debated changing the plugin before I was aware it was patchable, but considering it is something fixable, I opted not to change it this year.

It should be noted that at the Enterprise tier especially the architecture can have a huge impact on these scores. WPPerformanceTester is a single threaded test whereas many of these setups are designed to use many servers.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
A2 Hosting A+
Altis Cloud A+
Blallo B
Performant Websites A+
Pressable A
Presslabs A+
Rocket.net A
Seravo A+
Servebolt A+
Servebolt Scale+ACD A+
Stoute Web Solutions B
WordPress VIP A+

Discussion

A2 Hosting, Altis Cloud, Performant Website, Presslabs, Seravo, Servebolt and WordPress VIP all earned A+

Pressable and Rocket.net earned A's.

Blallo and Stoute Web Solutions earned B's.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.


Individual Host Analysis

A2 Hosting's first entry into the Enterprise Tier is a nice signal they are going to be competing. The Static test saw A2 Hosting take third place for average response time with 5.4ms and tied for second at 13ms for p95. A2 also had perfect uptime and an A+ SSL test. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test was a bit too much for with the server beginning to slow down around 4250 users. It's great to see A2 Hosting competing in the Enterprise tier and the Static test showed they certainly can compete, but there's a little improvement still left to do before they earn Top Tier status.
Visit A2 Hosting Website
Altis Cloud was a first time participant in the benchmarks. Altis Cloud is the enterprise hosting platform by well known WordPress consulting company HumanMade. Altis Cloud certainly stood out on the Static test in the best kind of way. Altis set a new record for the fastest average response time at 4.5ms and 11ms p95. Altis also had perfect uptime on both monitors. Altis was the second fastest average on WPT and the fastest in California and Dubai. Altis also picked up an A+ SSL test. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test was a little rocky with some odd spikes related to cache expiring issues that couldn't be fixed within the testing window. Despite the cache expiry issue Altis Cloud had the second fastest Asset response time. It was nice to see Altis finally enter the benchmarks this year and earn an Honorable Mention. It looks to be about one caching issue away from Top Tier status.
Visit Altis Cloud Website
Blallo is another new entrant for the benchmarks and Enterprise tier. This GridPane powered hosting company picked up the third fastest Page cumulative average in the Load Storm test. They also had an identical 22ms average in the Static test alongside other GridPane powered hosts Stoute Web Solutions and Performant Websites. Blallo had perfect uptime on both monitors. Blallo's first performance earned it Top Tier recognition, it handled all the tests with ease.
Visit Blallo Website
Performant Websites's sophomore performance did not slump. In fact, Performant Websites had the second fastest wp-login on the Load Storm test. The 22ms and 33ms average and p95 on the Static test were no slouch either. There was a minor issue with an uptime monitor being blocked but the other showed 99.9995% uptime. They also earned an A+ on the SSL test. Performant Websites defended their Top Tier status with a great repeat performance.
Visit Performant Websites Website
Pressable had the second fastest p95 and third fastest login on the Load Storm test. Pressable also had the second fastest average and p95 on the Static test with 5.2ms and 13ms respectively. Perfect uptime. This is the first time since 2020 that Pressable competed in the Enterprise tier and they didn't lose a step. Congrats Pressable for earning Top Tier status.
Visit Pressable Website
Presslabs had the fastest everything (p95, wp-login, page, asset, login) in the Load Storm test, along with 0 errors. The Static test also went well with 10ms and 27ms average/p95 respectively. Perfect uptime. The highest PHP bench after anyone not named Servebolt. Presslabs earned an A+ on the SSL test for good measure. Presslabs easily earned Top Tier status this year with their blazingly fast and consistent performance.
Visit Presslabs Website
Rocket.net's first participation in the Enterprise benchmarks certainly made a splash. Rocket.net had the second fastest Page and Login cumulative average speeds on the Load Storm test. The Static test was a quick 22/31ms average/p95. They also had perfect uptime. Rocket.net stood out on the WPT with the fastest average at 187ms and the fastest score in 9/12 locations. Rocket.net also picked up the third fastest WP Bench after both Servebolt plans. It's nice to see Rocket.net jump into the Enterprise tier and earn itself Top Tier status right away.
Visit Rocket.net Website
Seravo's return to the Enterprise tier was a little rocky. The Load Storm test ran into a problem with a bug in the proxy that couldn't be fixed before the testing was finished which cause the test to error out. The Static test went smoothly and saw an average response time of 117ms but that was a noticeable step above all the other competitors. Seravo was the only plan without an integrated CDN reducing load speeds globally and it showed in some of the tests. Seravo maintained 99.99%+ uptime on both monitors. Seravo earned an A+ on the SSL test. The proxy bug in the Load Storm test kept Seravo away from earning any rewards, but it's clear there is a solid platform that a fix or two gets it back into the Top Tier, and a CDN wouldn't hurt.
Visit Seravo Website
Servebolt consistently delivers excellent results. Servebolt stood out again on the WPPerformanceTester results where they delivered the highest scores seen on this benchmark. Servebolt handled the Load Storm test without issue. The Static test had a snappy 33ms and 43ms average and p95 response times. The Uptime numbers were off because of a security measure blocking them while the servers remained online (I confirmed they were loading during that window myself). Servebolt had the fourth fastest average on the WPT test. Add in an A+ on the SSL test for good measure and Servebolt earned yet another Top Tier award.
Visit Servebolt Website
Servebolt's Scale + ACD plan had near identical results in Load Storm and the Static test where the the p95 differed by 4ms, the wp login by 2ms, the Page by 12ms, login by 5ms and identical Asset and static average+p95. The Scale+ACD plan didn't have the uptime monitoring issue and showed 100% and 99.99%+ uptime. It also picked up the fastest WPT time in Mumbai. The Scale+ACD plan managed the fastest PHP Bench and WP Bench score narrowly edging out the Servebolt Enterprise plan. It would be impossible not to give Servebolt Scale+ACD a Top Tier award again this year after a great performance.
Visit Servebolt Scale+ACD Website
Stoute Web Solutions was a new entrant to the benchmarks this year. Their first foray was quite a success. The Load Storm test was handled gracefully with no signs of load. The Static test had a 22ms and 29ms average and p95 respectively which is very fast. Uptime remained above 99.9%. Stoute Web Solutions didn't lead any categories or tests in their first run, but they delivered a service worthy of Top Tier recognition. The tests were handled without issue and the service delivered, congratulations.
Visit Stoute Web Solutions Website
WordPress VIP is a familiar face in the Enterprise benchmarks. They've been a model of consistency earning Top Tier recognition every year they've participated. This year was no exception. The Load Storm test saw WPVIP earn the third fastest p95, wp-login, and asset response times. The Static test had a 5.7ms average and 13ms p95 (tied for second fastest). WordPress VIP maintained perfect uptime on both monitors. They also earned third fastest average for WPT. Overall, an unsurprising Top Tier status earned yet again for a stellar performance.
Visit WordPress VIP Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

$51-100/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Cloudways competed with a DigitalOcean 8GB Premium Droplet.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
Cloudways $96Unlimited8 GB RAM, 4vCPU160 GB NVMe5 TBUnlimited
Pressable $90150000512 MB/PHP process50 GBUnlimited10
Presslabs $8499,000 page views1 GB60 GBUnmetered1
Servebolt $99UnlimitedUnlimited10 GBUnmetered server bandwidth. 100 GB CDN bandwidth.5
WPX $99Unlimited384 MB/PHP process, 3 processes/site60 GBUnlimited*35
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Wp-login Average Response TimePage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum Avg
Cloudways 48308460406.252633583149120504051318
Pressable 6790780592.2536925018017919188
Presslabs 6914860586.2537619714814711151
Servebolt 7577301656.6741226516519519212
WPX 58280914506.6731726519217013182

Discussion

Pressable, Presslabs, Servebolt, and WPX all handled this test without issue.

Cloudways started to show signs of load around 1300 VUsers and response times started to slowly increase with a large spike towards the end.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
Cloudways 80391301765120883230
Pressable 896014019775.398513
Presslabs 89264901967.339.198127
Servebolt 88338601950.332097027
WPX 89073501973.671197856

Discussion

Everyone handled the static test well. There was literally not an error between all the companies combined. Last year I was impressed to see 4 companies below 50ms, now it's 4 companies below 20ms. The field continues to improve each and every year which is fantastic for everyone.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
Cloudways 10099.9944
Pressable 100100
Presslabs 100100
Servebolt 10099.995
WPX 100100

Discussion

Uptime Robot showed every company at perfect 100% uptime. Hetrix Tools had everyone above 99.99%. Basically perfect across the board.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
Cloudways 22550840151852912231210121591811476981012800
Pressable 2803554104195321538664277401294410321492
Presslabs 187214343238245945214215215187206273290
Servebolt 204456411324391225864235218422326390372
WPX 21423327721121723810612075022341223140396

Discussion

Presslabs had the fastest average at 290ms and 6/12 fastest single location speeds.

Servebolt was the second fastest at 372ms and picked up 1/12 fastest single location speeds.

WPX was the third fastest at 396ms and picked up 5/12 fastest single location speeds.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
Cloudways 9.364285.5511136
Pressable 9.6921692.047377
Presslabs 6.8211383.125864
Servebolt 4.2264830.917874
WPX 7.7462164.502165

Discussion

Servebolt had the fastest PHP bench and WP Bench scores by a significant margin. Servebolt run a patched version of MariaDB whereas the default version performs AES_ENCRYPT() function slower. I debated changing the plugin before I was aware it was patchable, but considering it is something fixable, I opted not to change it this year.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
Cloudways A
Pressable A
Presslabs A
Servebolt A+
WPX A

Discussion

A's for everyone except Servebolt, who received an A+.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.

No company achieved this status.


Individual Host Analysis

Cloudways handled the Static test without issue. It even was about 25% faster compared to last year which is nice to see. Cloudways' Uptime was 100% and 99.9944% which is excellent. The other test results didn't stand out, and they are maybe hindered a bit by not having a CDN by default like the competition at this price. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test was its Achilles heel again this year with a slow down starting around 1300 VUsers again. The server couldn't keep up with the requests and response times climbed to a point outside of recognition range again.
Visit Cloudways Website
Pressable had an excellent Load Storm test with the second fastest p95 and third fastest on all the metrics. Pressable took it to near light speed with 5.3ms average response time on the Static test. Pressable had perfect uptime on both monitors. Pressable has been one of the more consistent Top Tier performers year after year, and this year is no exception - congrats on another Top Tier performance.
Visit Pressable Website
Presslabs swept the Load Storm metrics with the fastest p95, wp-login, page, asset and login speeds. It had the second fastest Static test in both average and p95 response time. Perfect uptime on both monitors. The fastest WPT average and fastest in 6/12 locations individually. It would be impossible to give Presslabs anything but Top Tier status for their results this year.
Visit Presslabs Website
Servebolt flew through the Load Storm test again with the second fastest wp-login and third fastest p95. A measly 20ms average response time on the Static test was nothing to scoff at as well. Uptime was perfect and 99.995%. Servebolt also managed the second fastest average on the WPT. It also continued it's benchmark leading results on PHP/WP Bench. It's one of the least shocking statements to say Servebolt earned Top Tier status again this year.
Visit Servebolt Website
WPX had another good year. The Load Storm test saw it clock in the second fastest Page, Asset and Login speed. The Static test had an blazingly fast 11ms average response time. Perfect uptime on both monitors is always nice to see as well. WPX's home built CDN showed off in the WPT results where they picked up 5/12 fastest speeds in individual locations. Overall, it was another great performance from WPX which earned them Top Tier status.
Visit WPX Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

<$25/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Due to the increase in participation fees this year, I started a Sponsorship program for new/small/first time participants who wanted to participate in the two lowest price tiers. I asked participating companies if any would be willing to sponsor the participation of other hosting companies that fit this criteria. Only 1 company took advantage of this program, WP Buzz.
I want to personally thank and recognize the four amazingly generous companies stepped forward and provided financial support to allow more companies to participate: 20i, Krystal Hosting, Nexcess and Pressable. Thank you.

Cloudways competed with a Digital Ocean Premium 1GB droplet.

ShortPixel Hosting is no longer being offered after the benchmarks finished but before publishing. The results are published for posterity.

Stromonic was sold during the tests and the new owner was not prepared to participate in the benchmark. No load tests were run. Some of the other tests were run, and the results are recorded for posterity.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
20i $7.99 / £5.99UnlimitedN/A10 GB50 GB1
34SP.com 9.95 GBPUnlimited 1.25 GB25 GBUnlimited 1
A2 Hosting $22.99Unlimited2 GBUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Bluehost $18.95Unlimited-100 GBUnlimitedUnlimited
Cloudways $12Unlimited1 GB RAM, 1vCPU25 GB NVMe1 TBUnlimited
EasyWP by Namecheap $19.88Unlimited1152 Mb100 GbNot limited1
GreenGeeks $4.95Unlimited2.0 GBUnlimitedUnmeteredUnlimited
Hostgator $18.99Unlimited-UnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
ICDSoft $10UnlimitedUnlimited100 GB5000 GB1
Krystal Hosting £9.99Unlimited2 GBUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Lightning Base $9.95100003 GB for PHP, with some processes, including MySQL, running outside of this.1 GB10 GB1
ManagedWPHosting $12Unlimited3 GB - variable bursts6 GB100 GB1
Nexcess $19UnlimitedN/A15 GB2 TB1
Pressable $195000512 MB/PHP process10 GBUnlimited1
ROMARG 19.95€~50,000/day8 GB50 GBUnmetered3
ShortPixel Hosting $5Unlimited1GB10 GB50 GBUnlimited
SiteGround $24.99100,000 Recommendationno hard limits20 GBunlimited trafficunlimited
Stoute Web Solutions $24.99UnlimitedBurst to 16GB20 GBUnlimited1
Stromonic $14.95Unlimited2 GB10 GB NVMe SSD50 GB5
WP Buzz $14UnlimitedUnlimited Unlimited Unlimited 1
WPX $24.99Unlimited384 MB/PHP process, 3 processes/site15 GB200 GB5
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Wp-login Average Response TimePage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum Avg
20i 339752211295.081841207380715305385
34SP.com 3578220303.42194563158169232159
A2 Hosting 48390936632541.582636631539597251600
Bluehost 35418416316.58192627244268198278
Cloudways 1546672032182.1784244471541713283592212847
EasyWP by Namecheap 3581390309.58195355185199177192
GreenGeeks 3687650323.42200583163245213168
Hostgator 10249822566171061.83556175131666171532249
ICDSoft 3723840325.5202321140147146144
Krystal Hosting 2945721248.421607839414638324724167
Lightning Base 3701470322.92201487162178209263
ManagedWPHosting 40975226691213.522383520126132961633
Nexcess 4095442367.4222343337333231394
Pressable 4531420390.5824625218318120190
ROMARG 3704030322.17201337332193178190
ShortPixel Hosting 3711940318.67202603167173243170
SiteGround 3081960261.6716744126117574234
Stoute Web Solutions 3567186306.5194543195288110295
Stromonic
WP Buzz 42386220358646.172301839184517021911957
WPX 39009379371.0821226520618113191

Discussion

34SP.com, Bluehost, GreenGeeks, ICDSoft, Lightning Base, Namecheap, Nexcess, Pressable, ROMARG, ShortPixel Hosting, Stoute Web Solutions, and WPX all didn't have issues with the Load Storm test.

20i and SiteGround had very good performances with a minor spike or two, but the issues didn't seem to impact the ability of the server to handle the load. Sometimes things happen on the networks out of the control of the server itself and I decided to err in favor of not penalizing the spikes and keep both results as good.

A2Hosting had issues starting around 300 VUsers slowing down and then erroring.

Cloudways started to slow down around 80 VUsers and started erroring towards the end.

Hostgator started to slow down around 425 users and then errored out.

Krystal Hosting started to slow down around 700 VUsers.

ManagedWPHosting spiked at 1000 VUsers and then recovered, but the spike caused slow response times and some errors.

WP Buzz started having issues around 250 VUsers and eventually errored out. This was due to security measures which couldn't be disabled.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
20i 429848095548472129
34SP.com 3968520873.5134436277
A2 Hosting 4479610990.835.449212
Bluehost 4425260973.831848625
Cloudways 3958700877.33137435289
EasyWP by Namecheap 3890870856.83157425263
GreenGeeks 4012400881.67122440231
Hostgator 4431644978.831648624
ICDSoft 3970940882131436267
Krystal Hosting 4002310880.5125440267
Lightning Base 4005910887.83124440242
ManagedWPHosting 3872140843.67162425423
Nexcess 4447211979.51348820
Pressable 4480710985.835.249212
ROMARG 3879930854.5160425305
ShortPixel Hosting 3947980869.33140434297
SiteGround 44076509722248475
Stoute Web Solutions 4349054972.172147730
Stromonic
WP Buzz 429834095148472130
WPX 4454780983.831148952

Discussion

Cloudways had some spikes due to max CPU towards the end of the test.

The remaining companies handled the Static test without much issue.

Last year 3 companies were sub 50ms average response times. This year that number is 10. Those numbers for the p95 metric jumped from 3 to 8 this year as well.

Pressable kept their fastest average response time but A2 Hosting was 0.2ms behind and tied them for fastest p95 this year.

Even at the other end, last year's slowest was 267/575 (avg/p95) while this year was 162/423 (avg/p95). ManagedWPHosting improved roughly 100ms faster average and 140ms faster p95. It's great to see such improvements at both ends.

It does seem like there is a pretty clear line between companies with and without CDNs installed by default.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
20i 100100
34SP.com 10099.9954
A2 Hosting 99.975100
Bluehost 100100
Cloudways 10099.9755
EasyWP by Namecheap 10099.9954
GreenGeeks 99.89499.9783
Hostgator 100100
ICDSoft 10099.9924
Krystal Hosting 10099.9991
Lightning Base 100100
ManagedWPHosting 10099.9991
Nexcess 99.99999.9873
Pressable 100100
ROMARG 99.96299.9372
ShortPixel Hosting 10099.9964
SiteGround 10099.9982
Stoute Web Solutions 10099.9868
Stromonic 99.94799.99
WP Buzz 10099.9991
WPX 10099.9995

Discussion

Only one company was below the 99.9% threshold on a single monitor: GreenGeeks on the Uptime Robot was a borderline 99.894%. Meanwhile HetrixTools showed it having 99.9783%. The error was from the very start of the uptime monitoring and it said SSL-Host Mismatch. Hetrix Tools had no issues recorded during the same time frame. I am erring on an uptime monitoring tool problem versus a GreenGeeks problem since it automatically resolved itself and the other service didn't have any issue.

All the other companies maintained 99.9%+ uptime on both monitors.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
20i 2872239232802239208541066193948724876626
34SP.com 5478848832112808941108942125215961071702864
A2 Hosting 209224748237663204215371213276661195351
Bluehost 445309851364629293102220421006636573319707
Cloudways 20752339751756011981225120691613467081007818
EasyWP by Namecheap 499223399862872152411481467773119010111374945
GreenGeeks 202333334492837113012319786629191458934793
Hostgator 29926754691642824218352140380932884286763
ICDSoft 242502406531596118815411319123911888521068889
Krystal Hosting 321655516533602122813771210141911848591102917
Lightning Base 284271259493524114796010298528708591033715
ManagedWPHosting 71912121009218244104215029091536182512458271024
Nexcess 273488436482663102610019707471005625909719
Pressable 28026747243257515321010279270315416382519
ROMARG 8541300964367359105612528811497165112888691028
ShortPixel Hosting 846132992333321692012648071697225711527341040
SiteGround 3832323222082231138193506577230197750413
Stoute Web Solutions 5664545995375352371164220239991260238503
Stromonic 618315579422109861622987277464123341984213421553519
WP Buzz 208218806213222897672949220931897865592
WPX 2322222982182302252142365052192320130421

Discussion

The chart can be adjusted by clicking on a company. Stromonic stands out here for being the slowest by a wide margin at every location. Once you remove them from the graph, it's a lot easier to see how the field who were actively participating performed.

A2 Hosting had the fastest average speed and was the fastest in 1/12 locations

SiteGround had the second fastest average speed and was the fastest in 3/12 locations

WPX had the third fastest average speed and was the fastest in 2/12 locations

GreenGeeks, WPBuzz, LightningBase, ShortPixel, Stoute Web Solutions, and 20i each picked up the fastest speed in a single location.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
20i 9.26388.9537145
34SP.com 15.623885.7395926
A2 Hosting 8.9221295.336788
Bluehost 11.698920.8103131
Cloudways 15.064488.997555
EasyWP by Namecheap 9.637885.7395926
GreenGeeks 10.1041418.439716
Hostgator 9.982632.5110689
ICDSoft 13.1911406.469761
Krystal Hosting 9.0891672.240803
Lightning Base 9.143481.9277108
ManagedWPHosting 6.8951067.235859
Nexcess 6.112304.147465
Pressable 9.7041700.680272
ROMARG 7.9181937.984496
ShortPixel Hosting 8.0062092.050209
SiteGround 9.877993.0486594
Stoute Web Solutions 7.2791926.782274
Stromonic 19.169105.1524711
WP Buzz 10.724409.5004095
WPX 7.6581869.158879

Discussion

Nexcess had the fastest PHP Bench and WP Bench. ShortPixel had the second fastest WP Bench and ROMARG was third. ManagedWPHosting and Stoute Web Solutions were second and third respectively on the PHP Bench.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
20i A+
34SP.com A
A2 Hosting A+
Bluehost A
Cloudways A
EasyWP by Namecheap A+
GreenGeeks A+
Hostgator A
ICDSoft A
Krystal Hosting A
Lightning Base A
ManagedWPHosting A+
Nexcess A
Pressable A
ROMARG A
ShortPixel Hosting A
SiteGround A
Stoute Web Solutions B
Stromonic B
WP Buzz A
WPX A

Discussion

Stromonic and Stoute Web Solutions had B's.

20i, A2 Hosting, GreenGeeks, ManagedWPHosting, and Namecheap had A+.

Everyone else earned an A.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.

No company achieved this status.


Individual Host Analysis

20i handled the Static test with ease scoring a quick 48ms average response time. 20i also had perfect uptime on both monitors. It picked up the fastest speed in Tokyo on WPT. It also had an A+ SSL Grade. The Load Storm was extremely borderline, it had a few errors, but well below any concerning threshold, and a spike, but otherwise handled it just fine. I'm erring on the side of not penalizing what could just be random network noise versus a deeper server performance issue. 20i earns Top Tier status for this years performance.
Visit 20i Website
34SP had an good showing in the Load Storm test with the second fastest wp-login, Page and Login speed. The Static test went by without any issues. Uptime was perfect and 99.9954%. It's nice to see 34SP.com delivered a Top Tier result again this year.
Visit 34SP.com Website
A2 Hosting stood out on the Static test with an staggeringly fast 5.4ms average response time, a mere 0.2ms behind Pressable, for second fastest average. It also tied Pressable for fastest p95 in the test. Uptime was perfect and 99.975%. A2 Hosting also had the fastest average speed on WPT and was the fastest in a single location. It also earned an A+ SSL grade. Unfortunately, A2 Hosting struggled with the Load Storm test and started to slow down around 300 VUsers and errored out later. There was a lot to like in the A2 Hosting's performance, but there's a little work left to be done before it earns Top Tier recognition.
Visit A2 Hosting Website
Bluehost took a year off after a slightly disappointing performance, but the break was worth it. Last time the Load Storm test proved a bit much for the plan. This year Bluehost handled the Load Storm test without issue. The Static test saw Bluehost score a snappy 18ms average and 25ms p95. Bluehost also had perfect uptime. It's always nice to see engineering efforts pay off, congrats to Bluehost on earning Top Tier status.
Visit Bluehost Website
It was not Cloudways' best performance. The Load Storm test started having issues early at 80 VUsers and started having errors towards the end. The Static test had some spikes due to CPU usage towards the end of the test. Uptime was perfect on one monitor and 99.9755% on another.
Visit Cloudways Website
Namecheap experienced no problems during the Load Storm test. The Static test went equally as well, both having zero errors. Uptime was 100% and 99.9954%. Namecheap also had an A+ SSL grade. Overall, the product was Top Tier and handled all the tests without any noticeable issues.
Visit EasyWP by Namecheap Website
GreenGeeks did well on the Load Storm test and even had the third fastest Login speed. GreenGeeks handled the Static test with a near perfectly flat response time. Uptime monitors showed 99.894% and 99.9783%. The Uptime Robot downtime was attributed to an SSL-Host Mismatch at the very start of the test. The other monitor noticed zero issues during this window, so the decision is erring on the side of tooling problem vs hosting problem. GreenGeeks picked up a fastest WPT speed in a single location. It also earned an A+ SSL grade. GreenGeeks had a Top Tier performance again this year.
Visit GreenGeeks Website
Hostgator is owned by Newfold Digital, same parent company as Bluehost, but the products are not the same. Hostgator actually slightly edged it's sister product in the Static test with an impressive 16ms average response time and 24ms p95. Hostgator had perfect uptime. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test exposed the difference in the Hostgator product vs Bluehost. Hostgator started to slow down around 425 VUsers and eventually errored out.
Visit Hostgator Website
ICDSoft stepped up their game last year and didn't let up. ICDSoft had the fastest wp-login, Page and Login speed on the Load Storm test. It also had the third fastest p95. The Static test went smoothly. Uptime was 100% and 99.9924%. It's great to see ICDSoft maintain consistency and earn back to back Top Tier awards.
Visit ICDSoft Website
Krystal Hosting handled the Static test without a single error. It had perfect uptime on one monitor and the other showed 99.9991%. Unfortunately, Krystal started to slow down around 700 VUsers during the Load Storm test which kept it out of award contention.
Visit Krystal Hosting Website
LightningBase is one of, if not, the longest continuous participant(s) in the benchmarks. The Load Storm test went well with LightningBase having the third fastest wp-login. The Static test also went well. Uptime was perfect. LightningBase also picked up a fastest single location speed on WPT. LightningBase's streak of longest continuous Top Tier awards continues.
Visit Lightning Base Website
ManagedWPHosting handled the Static test fine, it may have been the slowest in average and p95, but the graph was flatish and slightly speeding up as the test went on with an average of 162ms. They had excellent uptime at perfect and 99.9991%. ManagedWPHosting also picked up the second fastest PHP Bench and an A+ SSL grade. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test had a spike right as it reached 1000VUsers causing a slow down, which it recovered from. However, it caused too much of a slow down and errors to be considered for an award. I'm not sure what caused it because it handled 1000VUsers after recovering for a while, but the product looks about one spike away from award consideration.
Visit ManagedWPHosting Website
Nexcess has been a regular participant in these benchmarks and missed earning any awards the last couple years at this price tier. But this was finally Nexcess's year. It's nice to see hard work and improvements pay off. The Load Storm test went by effortlessly. The Static test saw Nexcess pickup the third fastest average and p95 at 13ms and 20ms respectively. Their Achilles heal had been uptime issues which were finally solved this year with 99.999% and 99.9873% uptime. Nexcess also had the fastest PHP and WP Bench scores. Nexcess finally earned a well deserved Top Tier award for this price tier.
Visit Nexcess Website
Pressable brought the speed again this year. Pressable had the fastest p95 on the Load Storm test and the second fastest Asset speed. Pressable also had the fastest Static test with an average response time of 5.2ms and 12ms p95. Perfect uptime on both monitors. Another year, another Top Tier for Pressable.
Visit Pressable Website
ROMARG was another first time participant in the benchmarks. The Load Storm and Static test went without issue, flat response times and zero errors is always nice to see. ROMARG's uptime was 99.962% and 99.9372%. ROMARG also picked up the third fastest WP Bench score. Overall, ROMARG's performance was Top Tier, it handled all the tests without showing any signs of stress.
Visit ROMARG Website
Despite no longer offering the product, ShortPixel Hosting had a very good showing. The Load Storm test went well and ShortPixel even managed the third fastest wp-login speed. The Static test also went well with 140ms average response time. ShortPixel also had perfect and 99.9964% uptime. ShortPixel even picked up the fastest speed in one location on the WPT and the second fastest WP Bench. It was a Top Tier performance for ShortPixel's hosting product.
Visit ShortPixel Hosting Website
SiteGround's Static test had a quick average response time of 22ms. The uptime was perfect and 99.9982%. SiteGround looked excellent on the WPT where it had the second fastest average and was the fastested in 3 locations individually. The Load Storm test went almost perfect but there was a few spikes that looked like a couple locations had networking issues causing the very small spikes. I've erred on the side of these being networking issues, as the server itself seemed fine and continued to server content fine to the other locations without any impact on loading speed. So SiteGround earns Top Tier status this year.
Visit SiteGround Website
Stoute Web Solutions is a new GridPane powered participant in the benchmarks. Stoute Web Solutions handled the Load Storm test without issue. While their results in the Load Storm test were somewhat middle of the pack, the Static test saw Stoute Web Solutions deliver a very fast 21ms average response time and 30ms p95. Uptime was solid at 100% and 99.9868%. It even picked up a fastest single location in the WPT. They also picked up third fastest PHP Bench. Stoute Web Solutions was a welcome newcomer that had an excellent first showing - earning themselves Top Tier recognition.
Visit Stoute Web Solutions Website
Stromonic was acquired mid-test and the new owner was not prepared or interested in participating. The results are incomplete. They were disqualified from any award consideration.
Visit Stromonic Website
WP Buzz was a new entrant this year and the only company to take advantage of the sponsorship program. The Static test went very well for WP Buzz with an average response time of 48ms. The uptime was 100% and 99.9991% which is fantastic. WP Buzz even picked up the fastest WPT speed in a single location. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test didn't go very well. There were issues starting around 250 VUsers and then errors. This was due to a security issue which couldn't be worked around. So there may very well be a very strong product underneath, but we weren't fully able to test it which kept WP Buzz from any award contention.
Visit WP Buzz Website
WPX has been a consistent Top Tier performer in these benchmarks. The Load Storm test went very well this year with WPX clocking the second fastest p95 and the fastest Asset speed. The Static test went equally as well with WPX having an blazingly fast average response time of 11ms, good for third overall. Uptime was 100% and 99.9995%. WPX also managed the third fastest average on the WPT with the fastest score in 2 locations. WPX's streak of Top Tier awards won't be broken this year.
Visit WPX Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

$25-50/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Cloudways competed with a Digital Ocean Premium 4GB droplet.

Stromonic was sold during the tests and the new owner was not prepared to participate in the benchmark. No load tests were run. Some of the other tests were run, and the results are recorded for posterity.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
A2 Hosting $48.99Unlimited8 GBUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Cloudways $50Unlimited4 GB RAM, 2 vCPU80 GB NVMe4 TBUnlimited
GreenGeeks $25.95Unlimited3 GBUnlimitedUnmetteredUnlimited
Krystal Hosting £3550000N/A10 GBUnlimited1
Pressable $2530000512 MB/PHP process20 GBUnlimited1
Presslabs $3330000 page views256 MB30 GBUnmetered1
Rocket.net $30250000128 GB10 GB50 GB1
SiteGround $39.99400,000 Recommendationno hard limit40 GBunlimited trafficunlimited
Stromonic $29.95Unlimited4 GB20 GB NVMe SSD100 GB15
WordPress.com $25UnlimitedN/A200 GBUnlimited1
WPX $49.99Unlimited384 MB/PHP process, 3 processes/site30 GB400 GB15
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Wp-login Average Response TimePage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum Avg
A2 Hosting 26340828357343.421437112393492451135
Cloudways 27547112435715060153372322714883004
GreenGeeks 3756370318.17204523155236206161
Krystal Hosting 3569431310.83194739397536238545
Pressable 4280590373.1723325618418321190
Presslabs 4595960399.9225024417317533179
Rocket.net 3573121304.75194405257263127258
SiteGround 3085790272.9216843727317474237
Stromonic
WordPress.com 6591010610.535829721324020564
WPX 3883369333.2521126320117412183

Discussion

GreenGeeks, Krystal Hosting, Pressable, Presslabs, Rocket.net, WordPress.com, and WPX didn't have any issues with the Load Storm test.

SiteGround had a few spikes during the test which exceeded 1000ms, they looked possibly network related and overall was generally very good.

A2Hosting started to slow down around 400 VUsers and then had errors.

Cloudways started to slow down around 700 VUsers.

Stromonic did not run any load tests.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
A2 Hosting 44767819876.149214
Cloudways 4014250885.67122441229
GreenGeeks 3999500888.83126439231
Krystal Hosting 3957370873138434271
Pressable 4480490986.675.249113
Presslabs 4357020956.672447895
Rocket.net 4408102967.172248731
SiteGround 4409870971.672148475
Stromonic
WordPress.com 44777309865.849213
WPX 4454370986.671148962

Discussion

The Static test went well for every single participant. It's very nice to see that trend continue. Delivering static content fast and at scale is becoming a default in the WordPress hosting space, even at the lower price tiers.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
A2 Hosting 100100
Cloudways 100100
GreenGeeks 10099.9935
Krystal Hosting 100100
Pressable 100100
Presslabs 100100
Rocket.net 100100
SiteGround 100100
Stromonic 10099.9931
WordPress.com 100100
WPX 100100

Discussion

This group had perfect uptime on Uptime Robot and near perfect with Hetrix Tools, with 2 companies below 100% and above 99.99%. Amazing.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
A2 Hosting 14514026912918313114222735923244598208
Cloudways 21255040852756412211220116887111537121017802
GreenGeeks 25645242753653311441209995862929637926742
Krystal Hosting 5831007820218252852128813441549185710431146997
Pressable 2683543945222991541885496411328273338509
Presslabs 2112103532192392048223506218673211549472
Rocket.net 222242329238218215309215237220228251244
SiteGround 3682283282252091121199611583219191747419
Stromonic 6649144186329451613523389899263047402447257320004555
WordPress.com 284321417285282987657275576284268287410
WPX 1992122771892262236162074732051343151360

Discussion

The chart can be adjusted by clicking on a company. Stromonic stands out here for being the slowest by a wide margin at every location. Once you remove them from the graph, it's a lot easier to see how the field who were actively participating performed.

A2 Hosting had the fastest average and was the fastest in 8/12 locations individually.

Rocket.net had the second fastest average.

WPX had the third fastest average and was the fastest in 2/12 locations.

Presslabs and SiteGround each picked up a fastest speed in a single location.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
A2 Hosting 9.241766.784452
Cloudways 7.547376.9317753
GreenGeeks 9.551610.305958
Krystal Hosting 9.312726.744186
Pressable 9.6791700.680272
Presslabs 7.011297.016861
Rocket.net 9.8241406.469761
SiteGround 9.3771158.748552
Stromonic 18.79491.5164272
WordPress.com 9.462314.814815
WPX 7.5661964.636542

Discussion

WordPress.com had the fastest WP Bench at 2314 (queries/second) and Presslabs had the fastest PHP Bench at 7.01 seconds.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
A2 Hosting A+
Cloudways A
GreenGeeks A+
Krystal Hosting A
Pressable A
Presslabs A+
Rocket.net A
SiteGround A
Stromonic B
WordPress.com A+
WPX A

Discussion

A2 Hosting, GreenGeeks, Presslabs and WordPress.com all had A+.

Everyone else had A's. Except Stromonic which had a B.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.


Individual Host Analysis

A2 Hosting had some incredible highs, like the Static test which say it record an average response time of 6.1ms and 14ms p95. A2 Hosting recorded perfect uptime. A2 Hosting also was a force to be reckoned with in the WPT test which saw it earn the fastest average and fastest individual speed in 8/12 locations. It also recorded an A+ grade on the SSL test. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test proved its undoing this year with a slow down starting around 400 VUsers and errors as well. There's some much potential here, I can't wait to see them get the Load Storm test figured out and joining the Top Tier.
Visit A2 Hosting Website
Cloudways handled the Static test perfectly, completely flat response time and no errors. Uptime was perfect as well. Cloudways, however, did struggle with the Load Storm test where it slowed down around 700 VUsers and response times shot up. There were relatively few errors, so the requests were still being served, just a lot slower than needed to earn recognition.
Visit Cloudways Website
GreenGeeks managed to deal with the Load Storm test well and had the fastest wp-login and Login speeds. The Static test also went well with a couple little spikes and zero errors. GreenGeeks had 100% and 99.9935% uptime which is excellent. Overall, GreenGeeks handled the tests remarkably well and earned another Top Tier award this year.
Visit GreenGeeks Website
Krystal Hosting handled the Static test effortlessly without a single error and completely flat response time graph. Krystal also had perfect uptime on both uptime monitors. The Load Storm test was mostly great except there was a consistent spike exactly every 5 minutes which increased response times above 1500ms on the p95 graph from it's baseline around ~700ms. I'm not sure if this was a cache clear or some other kind of cron job, but something looks like it was taxing the server specifically every 5 minutes causing a tiny load spike. Unfortunately, the spikes were just a little too large by the end of the test, so Krystal Hosting earned an Honorable Mention this year. I have high hopes Krystal will rejoin the Top Tier next year, they're only one timer away.
Visit Krystal Hosting Website
Pressable had no issue with the Load Storm test, in fact it had the second fastest p95 and third fastest wp-login and Asset speed. Pressable also blazed through the Static test leading the pack with a 5.2ms average and 13ms p95. Pressable also had perfect uptime. Simply put, Pressable aced all the tests thrown at it and earned Top Tier status.
Visit Pressable Website
Presslabs handled the Load Storm test fabulously. It had the fastest p95, second fastest wp-login and Login speed, and the third fastest Page speed. The Static test also went well with a 24ms average response time. Uptime was perfect. Presslabs also managed to have the fastest single speed location on WPT in Tokyo. It also managed an A+ SSL grade and the fastest PHP Bench. It doesn't get old awarding Presslabs another Top Tier award.
Visit Presslabs Website
Rocket.net handled the Load Storm test without any issues. It also handled the Static test without any issues having a very fast 22ms average response time and 31ms p95 which was the 4th fastest which is always impressive to have average and p95 as close together as possible. Rocket.net had perfect uptime. Rocket.net picked up the second fastest average on the WPT. Overall, Rocket.net took these tests in stride and didn't break a sweat. It didn't stand out in any statistical category, but it was consistently quick in all the tests. Rocket.net earns a well deserved Top Tier award.
Visit Rocket.net Website
SiteGround flew through the Static test with 21ms average response time without a single error. SiteGround also had perfect uptime. It even picked up the fastest speed in a single location in WPT. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test was a little spikey. There were a few spikes going over 1000ms throughout the test and it wasn't just a single location having issues, the spikes were across multiple regions. It could have been network issues or could have been minor server issues. For that reason, SiteGround earns an Honorable Mention this year.
Visit SiteGround Website
Stromonic was acquired mid-test and the new owner was not prepared or interested in participating. The results are incomplete. They were disqualified from any award consideration.
Visit Stromonic Website
WordPress.com had no issues with the Load Storm test and even picked up the second fastest Asset speed. The Static test went even better with the second fastest average response at 5.8ms and tied for first with 13ms in p95. Perfect uptime on both monitors. WordPress.com also managed to pickup the fastest WP Bench score and an A+ SSL grade. It's easy to say WordPress.com handled these tests without blinking and earned Top Tier status again this year.
Visit WordPress.com Website
WPX handled the Load Storm test without issue. It had the fastest Page and Asset speed, along with the third fastest p95 and Login speed. The Static test went equally as well with an incredibly fast 11ms average response time. WPX had perfect uptime on both monitors. It also had the third fastest average speed on WPT and was the fastest in 2/12 locations. WPX continues to earn Top Tier recognition year after year with excellent performances like this one.
Visit WPX Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

$101-200/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2023

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Cloudways competed with a DigitalOcean 16GB Premium Droplet.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
A2 Hosting $189.99Unlimited16 GB250 GB3 TBUnlimited
Cloudways $160Unlimited16 GB RAM, 8vCPU320 GB NVMe6 TBUnlimited
Leverage WP $197Unlimited16 GB160 GB20 TBUnlimited
Pressable $155400000512 MB/PHP process80 GBUnlimited20
Presslabs $150210,000 page views2.5 GB90 GBUnmetered1
Seravo 110 EUR3,000,000 HTTP req (soft limit)10 GB+60 GB2 Gbps+1
Servebolt $182UnlimitedUnlimited16 GBUnmetered server bandwidth. 100 GB CDN bandwidth.5
SiteGround $200.00no limit12 GB RAM / 8 CPU Cores80 GB SSD5 TBno limit
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Wp-login Average Response TimePage Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum Avg
A2 Hosting 7487371089771.334073503293923651751655
Cloudways 6779430658.4236823518741223349821
Leverage WP 74765077638.7540630918219656180
Pressable 9075600765.4249324917917918187
Presslabs 9222260776.4250119114514211147
Seravo 7565290635.33411563152154206152
Servebolt 10070881856.7554726718524820273
SiteGround 6201420526.5833732920612561205

Discussion

Pressable, Presslabs, Seravo, Servebolt and SiteGround all handled this test without issue.

Leverage WP had a slightly bumpy start but handled the test without issue with the p95 starting under 1000ms and dropping down to around 300ms as the test went on.

A2Hosting started to slow down around 1400 users.

Cloudways started to slow down and show signs of load around 1200 VUsers, but didn't ever show a single error.




K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
A2 Hosting 134404602960.335.3147512
Cloudways 120365802641.831221321230
Leverage WP 117421512584.831511290317
Pressable 134370902959.335.5147713
Presslabs 1338863029549.1147027
Seravo 1209808026701171328227
Servebolt 132439122932.520145428
SiteGround 13223240290622145275

Discussion

Every company handled this test without issue. Incredibly the median average response time would be 20-22ms.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
A2 Hosting 99.998100
Cloudways 100100
Leverage WP 10099.9995
Pressable 100100
Presslabs 100100
Seravo 99.9899.9927
Servebolt 10099.995
SiteGround 99.93399.9389

Discussion

All the companies maintained 99.9% uptime or higher.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
A2 Hosting 196210390199921201217327199358698127337
Cloudways 20449039653253812391445122190911447011016820
Leverage WP 247663725763618976193918207359185811257937
Pressable 2842923912903261657948739532267295333530
Presslabs 209229331229241950206209211222218312297
Seravo 26741431253962712561213118490710287891151807
Servebolt 227216426226295207799234231323344273317
SiteGround 37823630322374611401962520640180202727624

Discussion

Presslabs had the fastest average speed in the WPT test and 2/12 fastest single location results.

Servebolt had the second fastest average but wasn't the fastest in any single location

A2 Hosting was the third fastest average and 6/12 of fastest single location speeds.

SiteGround had 4/12 of the fastest single location speeds.

Despite A2 Hosting and SiteGround picking up the majority of the fastest single location speeds, a couple slow results in other locations pulled down their averages.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
A2 Hosting 9.6541305.483029
Cloudways 9.169492.3682915
Leverage WP 8.439964.3201543
Pressable 9.6731694.915254
Presslabs 6.9711385.041551
Seravo 8.433353.8570418
Servebolt 4.2274830.917874
SiteGround 9.0251375.515818

Discussion

Servebolt had the fastest PHP bench and WP Bench scores by a significant margin. Servebolt run a patched version of MariaDB whereas the default version performs AES_ENCRYPT() function slower. I debated changing the plugin before I was aware it was patchable, but considering it is something fixable, I opted not to change it this year.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
A2 Hosting A+
Cloudways A
Leverage WP B
Pressable A
Presslabs A+
Seravo A+
Servebolt A+
SiteGround A

Discussion

A2 Hosting, Presslabs, Seravo, and Servebolt all earned A+'s. Everyone else earned an A, except Leverage WP which earned a B.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.

No company achieved this status.


Individual Host Analysis

A2 Hosting had some extreme highs with it being the fastest Static test with an incredible 5.3ms average and 12ms p95. A2 Hosting also managed 99.998% and 100% uptime on each monitor. A2 Hosting was the third fastest average speed on WPT and the fastest in 6/12 locations. Toss in an A+ SSL grade for good measure. There were so many impressive results. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test proved a bit too much which saw a slow down around 1400 users and a number of errors later. You can tell it has a lot of things going for it - leading the pack in speed in multiple metrics. I can't wait to see it get fully put together and earning Top Tier status in the coming years.
Visit A2 Hosting Website
Cloudways had a flat Static test which is exactly what you want. Cloudways also managed perfect uptime. It was middle of the pack in the other tests. But the problem was the Load Storm test. Cloudways slowed down and became very spiky around 1200 users. It never errored but the p95 was 2351ms which indicates how much the service slowed down. The performance seems to have gone down a little compared to last year which used a similarly sized Vultr HF server. Cloudways showed last year they were capable of coming close to earning Top Tier status, I'd like to see them return.
Visit Cloudways Website
Leverage WP was a new comer to the benchmarks this year and another GridPane powered provider. The Load Storm test took a few minutes to really get going with a little shakiness at the start. But the p95 was below 1000ms and came down relatively quickly as the test scaled up. It even managed the third fastest login speed. The Static test shows Leverage WP as the slowest, but even the slowest average handled the test well and was a meager 151ms. The Uptime monitors showed 100% and 99.9995% uptime which is excellent. It's a non impacting metric, but the SSL grade for Leverage WP was a B which I would like to see match everyone else with at least an A next year. Leverage WP may not have been the flashiest or fastest host in this cohort, but handled the tests well without ever slowing down or breaking. Leverage WP's first participation could only be considered a success and deserving of a Top Tier award.
Visit Leverage WP Website
Pressable aced the Load Storm test with no errors and the second fastest p95 and Asset load speeds. It also had the third fastest wp-login. The Static test was showing off with an insanely fast 5.5ms average response time and a p95 of 13ms. Pressable managed perfect uptime on both monitors. Another benchmark, another Top Tier award for Pressable.
Visit Pressable Website
Presslabs was impressive in the Load Storm test capturing the fastest speeds in every metric except Page load speed, where it was second. It also boasted a sub 10ms average response time on the Static test. Throw in perfect uptime on both monitors and the fastest average speed on WPT and you've easily earned another Top Tier award. Well done.
Visit Presslabs Website
Seravo did excellent on the Load Storm test. It had the second fastest wp-login and Login average. Seravo also had the third fastest Page loading speed. The Static test went equally as well with Seravo having no errors and a 117ms average response time. Their Uptime was 99.98%+ and 99.99%+ which is very good. It was definitely a Top Tier performance for Seravo this year.
Visit Seravo Website
Servebolt handled the Load Storm test with ease. It had the third fastest p95 and Asset load speed. The Static test had a very fast 20ms average and 28ms p95 response times. Servebolt's uptime was 100 and 99.995%. They also had the second fastest WPT average speed. Servebolt had the fastest PHP/WP Bench scores by a wide margin. The streak continues, Servebolt's performance was Top Tier.
Visit Servebolt Website
SiteGround had a very good Load Storm test with no errors and the fastest Page loading time. The Static test went effortlessly as well with no errors and a 22ms average response time. SiteGround maintained 99.9%+ uptime. SiteGround also managed 4/12 of the fastest single location WPT speeds. SiteGround earned a Top Tier award this year not struggling at all with any of the tests.
Visit SiteGround Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

Enterprise ($500+/Month) WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2022

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

The Enterprise tier of these benchmarks is special in that companies are allowed to change configurations to optimize for performance because at this price tier it’s expected for customers paying a lot of money. All other price tiers test default configurations.

Servebolt submitted two plans, the Scale + ACD plan is utilizing their Scale and Accelerated Domains addon which adds performance, scalability and security enhancements.

Cloudways competed with a 4XL plan from Google Cloud.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
Cloudways $722Unlimited60 GB20 GB2 GBUnlimited
Performant Websites $1250unlimited32 GB30 GB10 TB1
Presslabs $599+UnlimitedCustom, depending on site needs100 GB+UnmeteredCustom
raidboxes 950€Unlimited64 GB40 GBUp to 10Gbit1
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo $1,279Unmetered96+ GBCustomUnmeteredBased on system resources
Servebolt $528Dynamic Requests are set per planUnmetered25Unlimited30
Servebolt Accelerated $2490Dynamic Requests are set per planUmeteredCustom > 200 GBUnlimited60
WordPress VIP Starts at $2000/moStarting price allows for 2M http requests per month. Can grow from there at additional costs up to unlimited.UnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedStarts at 1 application, which can be a multisite with no limits. Additional applications available for extra cost with no limit on how many we can support.
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Page Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum AvgWp-login Average Response Time
Cloudways 26034383598392221.081423723235337227159
Performant Websites 1692580161393.75920287216159221182
Presslabs 220495701822.67119821015613163152
raidboxes 245903469378268913363231177131926822547
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 18787074691656.83102126917519211178
Servebolt (Scale + ACD) 2425293541991.67131824620426196193
Servebolt 242095591961.25131125020926201196
WordPress VIP 170374211435.9292530121114184226

Discussion

Performant Websites, Presslabs, Scaleforce, Servebolt (both) and WordPress VIP all handled this test without issue.

Cloudways ran into issues around 1500 VUsers where login stopped responding and caused errors. The numbers appear artificially low because of this.

Raidboxes started slowing down around 3700 VUsers with errors kicking in around 4600 VUsers.

Overall, it's impressive how fast most of these companies are. With the exception of Raidboxes (and Cloudways gets an asterisk), every host is loading pages under 300ms. More than half the companies are loading assets sub 30ms. At the high end, you really have a lot of high performing globally available options.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
Cloudways 183313504030.172292012473
Performant Websites 2161496104758.8342234954
Presslabs 22215600492314243653
raidboxes 178941603931.332591964575
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 22310521404926.839.5245228
Servebolt (Scale + ACD) 218341524814.6731239448
Servebolt 217594664782.3335234048
WordPress VIP 223741604924.676.4245620

Discussion

Every company handled this test very well. It is very clear which companies have CDNs setup though based on the average response times. The P95 of all but two companies being under 60ms is just impressive.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
Cloudways 99.99699.8335
Performant Websites 100100
Presslabs 10099.9951
raidboxes 10099.9996
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 100100
Servebolt (Scale + ACD) 100100
Servebolt 100100
WordPress VIP 100100

Discussion

Every company with the exception of Cloudways had 100% on at least one monitor. Cloudways had very different uptimes as measured by the two providers (happened across multiple plans tested). But the higher of the two uptime monitors showed 99.99%+ which seems to indicate the server was responsive.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
Cloudways 0.260.3160.2790.5560.6131.3281.0471.3110.7420.9920.8431.330.8014166667
Performant Websites 0.4040.1590.2690.3170.3880.1510.1850.3180.3690.2510.6540.2430.309
Presslabs 0.1550.1430.260.1410.1730.2220.1540.1690.2130.1550.160.1370.1735
raidboxes 0.6040.9080.8640.3310.1690.8850.8840.7711.3271.531.1560.6930.8435
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 0.2820.2460.2920.220.2410.2740.3870.2220.3290.1560.2461.0510.3288333333
Servebolt (Scale + ACD) 0.2670.3170.3790.2020.3190.1610.7670.3030.2430.310.4450.2670.3316666667
Servebolt 0.3470.1970.3420.3930.4260.1750.6540.220.2570.3970.3370.2620.3339166667
WordPress VIP 0.2150.1680.2430.220.2540.2630.2260.2090.2430.2360.2370.3010.2345833333

Discussion

Presslabs is the obvious standout here with 10/12 of the fastest response times alongside the fastest average response time at a snappy 0.1735s.

WPVIP and Performant Websites managed to grab the other two fastest response times. They also managed the second and third fastest averages respectively.

Raidboxes and Cloudways stood out on the slower end because of the lack of CDN setup in this configuration.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
Cloudways 9.968624.2197253
Performant Websites 9.7731094.091904
Presslabs 6.9981865.671642
raidboxes 8.1851402.524544
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 9.705400
Servebolt (Scale + ACD) 5.8392132.196162
Servebolt 5.8452227.171492
WordPress VIP 8.4081280.409731

Discussion

Servebolt led the way here. They took the top two spots in both tests. Presslabs was third in both tests.

Scaleforce shows us that raw single threaded speed doesn't make or break an enterprise configuration. Despite having the slowest WP Bench and one of the slowest PHP Bench scores, a clustered configuration can handle massive scale and perform well in real world delivery.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
Cloudways A
Performant Websites A+
Presslabs A+
raidboxes A+
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo A+
Servebolt (Scale + ACD) A+
Servebolt A+
WordPress VIP A+

Discussion

Everyone got an A+ except Cloudways which earned an A.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.

No company achieved this status.


Individual Host Analysis

The one thing Cloudways did well this year was the static test. It handled it without issue. We could add in uptime if we assume it was a glitch on the monitoring end which affected all Cloudways servers being monitored by Hetrix Tools. But Cloudways struggled with the Load Storm test with the login erroring completely. There is some definite room for improvement.
Visit Cloudways Website
New entrant Performant Websites stepped into the biggest ring and showed they belong. Perfect uptime. The third fastest WPT average including being the fastest in Cape Town. They handled all the tests without any issues, well done and welcome to the Top Tier.
Visit Performant Websites Website
Presslabs absolutely crushed the Load Storm test. They had the fastest P95, Page, Asset, and login times. Presslabs also had the third fastest average response time for the static test at 14ms. Throw in a tour de force of the WebPageTest benchmark where they were the fastest in 10/12 locations and had the fastest average response time. Sprinkle in perfect or near perfect uptime on both monitors and you've got yourself an excellent Top Tier worthy performance.
Visit Presslabs Website
The bright spots for Raidboxes were it handled the static test effortlessly and the uptime was near perfect at 100% and 99.9996%. The less bright spots were that Raidboxes struggled with the Load Storm test which seems to have overwhelmed the system. Raidboxes also didn't have any sort of CDN integrated which slowed down global response times and averages on many of the tests. I hope with the recent acquisition we see some improvements that brings them back to to Top Tier status.
Visit raidboxes Website
Scaleforce had the second fastest wp-login, and page speed, along with third fastest asset speeds on the Load Storm test. Scaleforce also had the second fastest average response time and p95 response time in the static test. Throw in perfect uptime for good measure and you've got another well earned Top Tier award.
Visit Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo Website
Servebolt had the second fastest P95 alongside third fastest page, asset speeds and login cum avg. Perfect uptime. It seems to have eked out a slight edge over its sister product in a few tests beating getting slightly fastest response times on an already Top Tier product. Well done.
Visit Servebolt (Scale + ACD) Website
Perfect uptime. Fastest WP/PHP Bench scores alongside it's sister product. Third fastest p95 in both Load Storm and Static tests. Servebolt Enterprise delivers another Top Tier performance.
Visit Servebolt Website
WPVIP had the second fastest asset and login cum avg scores on the Load Storm test. WPVIP had the fastest average and p95 response times on the Static test. WPVIP also had perfect uptime on both monitors. WPVIP also picked up the second fastest average response time average on the WPT. WPVIP continues to prove itself year after year as a Top Tier product. Congratulations.
Visit WordPress VIP Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

$201-500/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2022

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Servebolt submitted two plans, the ACD plan is utilizing their Accelerated Domains addon, which adds performance, scalability and security enhancements.

Cloudways competed with an XL AWS instance.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
Cloudways $275Unlimited16 GB20 GB2 GBUnlimited
Nexcess $299unmetered20 GB RAM base with burst300 GB5 TB50
Pressable $3501,000,000512 MB / Process200 GBUnlimited50
Presslabs $299500,000 page viewsDinamically allocated up to 10G15 GBUnmetered1 site
raidboxes 300€Unlimited32 GB40 GBUp to 10Gbit1
Servebolt $492Dynamic Requests are set per planUmetered34 GBUnlimited30
Servebolt Accelerated $248Dynamic Requests are set per planUnmetered6 GB (+flex)Unlimited5
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Page Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum AvgWp-login Average Response Time
Cloudways 13015631766591128.75711671227293276157
Nexcess 94817330796.25515509300149291267
Pressable 10630600870.8357830919570230205
Presslabs 11032270909.0860121915813166151
raidboxes 7712530627.174182831158032616471465
Servebolt 121249901062.1765925621319217199
Servebolt ACD 120957331069.565727122925229221

Discussion

Nexcess, Pressable, Presslabs, and both Servebolt plans handled this test without any issues.

Cloudways started erroring around 900 VUsers.

Raidboxes started to show signs of load around 1900 VUsers and had increasing response times.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
Cloudways 148644303280.332121630489
Nexcess 144270303181.672481580473
Pressable 179095303939.55.9196619
Presslabs 177700603908.6714194653
raidboxes 143166403158.172581572583
Servebolt 153157293368.671761629283
Servebolt ACD 173792903849.3337190850

Discussion

Every company handled the static test near flawlessly. Zero total errors for all companies. The average and P95 response times show which companies have CDNs (or more relevant CDN locations for our test). The difference between Servebolt and Servebolt with Accelerated Domains is pretty clear here, ACD is adding a lot of speed.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
Cloudways 99.99699.8954
Nexcess 99.99699.9926
Pressable 99.994100
Presslabs 10099.9955
raidboxes 99.99199.99
Servebolt 100100
Servebolt ACD 10099.9888

Discussion

Everyone except Cloudways had near perfect uptime. Cloudways had an issue across multiple tests where one monitor struggled for a short window but the other was reporting it fine.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
Cloudways 0.1790.3890.3620.470.521.2051.1361.1190.8251.0640.6581.0110.7448333333
Nexcess 0.3340.5250.4690.5861.0561.7011.341.4320.9031.5961.1621.8211.077083333
Pressable 0.2150.3350.3150.2310.1870.2540.2440.6610.2450.1740.3160.4670.3036666667
Presslabs 0.1730.140.2620.1520.1840.210.1480.1670.170.150.1610.140.1714166667
raidboxes 0.6870.930.8750.2220.2260.8950.910.8011.2671.571.1550.7030.8534166667
Servebolt 0.3560.2970.4330.5770.6780.9881.0170.9720.7740.8420.6770.9610.7143333333
Servebolt ACD 0.4140.4520.490.2970.30.2770.4680.4770.4980.2620.5280.2790.3951666667

Discussion

Presslabs went a perfect 12/12 as the fastest in every region. Pressable was the second fastest with Servebolt + ACD not far behind.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
Cloudways 8.993478.6979416
Nexcess 7.7281044.932079
Pressable 10.0131347.708895
Presslabs 6.891538.461538
raidboxes 7.9711466.27566
Servebolt 5.862222.222222
Servebolt ACD 5.8652207.505519

Discussion

Both Servebolt plans stood out as having the fastest scores in both tests which were near identical to one another.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
Cloudways A
Nexcess A
Pressable A
Presslabs A+
raidboxes A+
Servebolt A
Servebolt ACD A+

Discussion

Everyone got an A with Presslabs, Raidboxes and Servebolt+ACD Earning A+.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.

No company achieved this status.


Individual Host Analysis

Cloudways handled the static test without issue. Cloudways had great uptime on one monitor and lower than expected on the other. This seemed like it maybe was a bug and showed on every Cloudways monitor on the Hetrix Tools platform. Unfortunately, the Load Storm caused the server to error out and fail the test. I'm not sure what happened but I hope they figure it out and we see a comeback next year.
Visit Cloudways Website
Nexcess had stellar uptime with both showing above 99.99%. Nexcess also handled the static and Load Storm tests without issue. While it didn't particularly stand out compared to some of it's peers, it delivered flawless results on everything we threw at it. Top Tier.
Visit Nexcess Website
Pressable had the fastest average and p95 load times on the static test. Pressable also picked up the 2nd fastest page response time in the Load Storm test. Pressable had perfect or near perfect uptime. Unsurprisingly, yet another Top Tier performance for Pressable - Well done.
Visit Pressable Website
Presslabs had the fastest P95, Page, Asset and login response times on the Load Storm test. Presslabs had the second fastest average response time and third fastest p95 on the static test. Throw in perfect or near perfect uptime. Presslabs also went 12/12 as the fastest location for every test on WebPageTest. Overall, a very impressive performance put on Presslabs which saw them at the top or near the top of every test. Top Tier.
Visit Presslabs Website
Raidboxes had an excellent 99.99%+ on both uptime monitors. The Static test was handled without issue. Unfortunately the Load Storm test was a bit too much and slowed the server down below the acceptable threshold of 1000ms to earn any recognition this year.
Visit raidboxes Website
Servebolt picked up 2nd fastest P95, asset and login response times in the Load Storm test. Servebolt had perfect uptime. Servebolt stood out as the fastest on the PHP and WP Benchmarks in a virtual tie with its other offering. Servebolt earned yet another Top Tier honor.
Visit Servebolt Website
Servebolt + ACD really shined over its sister product in the static load test and earned itself the 2nd fastest p95 load time. Servebolt + ACD picked up 3rd fastest P95, asset and login response times in the Load Storm test. Servebolt had perfect and near perfect uptime on the monitors. Servebolt stood out as the fastest on the PHP and WP Benchmarks in a virtual tie with its other offering. The ACD addition didn't slow Servebolt down, it doubled down on a second Top Tier award.
Visit Servebolt ACD Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

$101-200/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks 2022

Please read the Methodology to fully understand the scope of these tests.

Note: Please check company profiles for summary of performances across multiple tiers. Some companies also offer promotions or coupon codes for a discount as well.

Cloudways competed with a VULTR HF 16GB.

The Companies and Products

CompanyPlan Monthly PricePlan Visitors AllowedPlan MemoryPlan Disk SpacePlan BandwidthPlan Sites Allowed
Cloudways $160Unlimited16 GB384 GB5 TBUnlimited
MechanicWeb $149Unlimited16 GB300 GB6 TBUnlimited
Nexcess $149Unmeteredcloud - variable bursts100 GB5 TB25
Pressable $155400,000512 MB / Process80 GBUnlimited20
raidboxes 150€Unlimited12 GB30 GBUp to 10Gbit1
SaveinCloud BRL 960UnlimitedUp to 32 GiB Based on usage.Up to 40 GBUnlimitedUnlimited
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo $199Unmetered16 GB30 GBUnmeteredBased on cluster resources
Servebolt $180Dynamic Requests are set per planUnlimited12 GB (+flex)Unlimited5
Simplenet $99 + VATno fixed limit2 vCPU / 4 GB RAM60 GB3 TB1
SiteGround $200No limit12 GB80 GBUnlimitedNo limit
View Full Products Table

LoadStorm Testing Results

The Load Storm test (in k6) is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.

The key metrics are:

Results Table

CompanyTotal RequestsTotal ErrorsPeak RpsAverage RpsP95Page Cum AvgAsset Cum AvgLogin Cum AvgWp-login Average Response Time
Cloudways 670247161571.17364735398251410279
MechanicWeb 6959880580.92378643262258269141
Nexcess 760687269664.83413499284143282259
Pressable 8509740708.8346230919471226211
raidboxes 1016051384161119.585525791301141348954915
SaveinCloud 722687109610.3339265139562378400
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 76176984653.541327318420288174
Servebolt 9694122846.2552726121919222203
Simplenet 1099535421651214.175974607243328338884023
SiteGround 7076720618.753851307027581647

Discussion

MechanicWeb, Pressable, Scaleforce, Servebolt and SiteGround all handled this test without issue.

Cloudways started to slow down and show signs of load around 1800 VUsers but handled it relatively ok.

Nexcess had one network spike that had a few errors and increased response times but did quite well overall.

Raidboxes started to show signs of load around 1100 VUsers and started erroring around 1700 VUsers.

Simplenet started showing signs of load around 1100 VUsers and erroring at around 1600 VUsers.

SaveInCloud had somewhat spikey average response times throughout the test, it handled it well for the most part though.

K6 Static Testing Results

K6 Static test is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.

Results Table

CompanyRequestsErrorsPeak RpsAverage Response TimeAverage RpsP95
Cloudways 117268202597.671521287295
MechanicWeb 108654602403.832411193447
Nexcess 107889002374.672521183477
Pressable 134340502966.55.8147518
raidboxes 107251902364.172601176575
SaveinCloud 9302252520544521017859
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 1338634929479.3147328
Servebolt 115488162558.51701269287
Simplenet 114521802530.171791257411
SiteGround 13266850292018145864

Discussion

Every company handled this test without issue.

Pressable, Scaleforce and SiteGround stood out with sub 20ms averages and clearly have CDN setup helping them excel in this test.

Uptime Testing Results

Uptime is monitored by two companies: HetrixTools and Uptime Robot. A self hosted monitor was also run in case there was a major discrepancy between the two third party monitors.

Results Table

CompanyUptime RobotHetrix
Cloudways 99.98599.8886
MechanicWeb 99.96999.9603
Nexcess 99.99799.9932
Pressable 99.998100
raidboxes 99.99199.9887
SaveinCloud 10099.9927
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 100100
Servebolt 99.97699.9884
Simplenet 10099.9913
SiteGround 99.96999.944

Discussion

All the companies kept above 99.9% uptime with the exception of Cloudways on the Hetrix Tools monitor. This issue happened on every Cloudways server this year where one monitor showed near perfect and the other had a window of downtime.

WebPageTest Testing Results

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 12 different locations around the world. Result are measured in seconds.

Results Table

CompanyVirginiaCaliforniaSalt Lake CityLondonFrankfurtCape TownSingaporeMumbaiTokyoSydneyBrazilDubaiAverage
Cloudways 0.1640.3360.3240.4940.541.1771.1151.0820.8441.010.6681.0730.7355833333
MechanicWeb 0.3130.2920.3320.6150.8761.3561.1641.3020.90.9390.8511.2130.8460833333
Nexcess 0.3310.5290.4260.5330.6081.6681.3331.420.981.5911.1841.8091.034333333
Pressable 0.3120.1590.3590.290.2360.2480.2410.4570.3560.1970.3971.0330.3570833333
raidboxes 0.60.9290.8680.2650.2190.9010.9520.7851.3041.5291.1740.6990.8520833333
SaveinCloud 0.8910.6760.7090.7591.5051.2081.241.4311.1251.2980.3771.541.06325
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 0.3090.1910.6930.2210.1860.2480.3960.2050.2870.2020.2221.0450.3504166667
Servebolt 0.3430.3320.3680.5750.6350.9691.1020.9550.8130.9150.8320.9690.734
Simplenet 0.2720.5760.4150.5610.5941.4371.4741.6491.0311.7160.8411.2060.981
SiteGround 0.4840.6290.420.8410.9321.7751.5471.7551.31.5451.2041.6231.17125

Discussion

Scaleforce just barely edged Pressable by a miniscule 7ms for the fastest average LCP speed. They were neck and neck and showing off their global load speeds. Scaleforce took 5/12 fastest with 1 tie with Pressable. Pressable picked up 3 fastest plus the aforementioned tie. Cloudways picked up two of the fastest speeds in Virginia and Salt Lake City. SaveInCloud picked up fastest speed in their native Brazil. Raidboxes got the fastest speed in Dubai.

WPPerformanceTester Testing Results

WPPerformanceTester performs two benchmarks. One is a WordPress (WP Bench) and the other is a PHP Bench. WP Bench measures how many WP queries per second and higher tends to be better (varies considerably by architecture). PHP Bench performs a lot of computational and some database operations which are measured in seconds to complete. Lower PHP Bench is better.

Results Table

CompanyPHP BenchWP Bench
Cloudways 5.7961597.444089
MechanicWeb 4.6443663.003663
Nexcess 8.547441.1116012
Pressable 10.0051324.503311
raidboxes 8.038919.9632015
SaveinCloud 10.031699.790063
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo 10.4741117.318436
Servebolt 5.92217.2949
Simplenet 8.4981644.736842
SiteGround 9.8461538.461538

Discussion

MechanicWeb was certainly a stand out getting the fastest score in both PHP and WP Bench.

SSL Testing Results

The tool is available at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

Results Table

CompanyQualsys SSL Grade
Cloudways A
MechanicWeb A
Nexcess A
Pressable A
raidboxes A+
SaveinCloud A+
Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo A
Servebolt A
Simplenet A+
SiteGround A

Discussion

Raidboxes, SaveInCloud and Simplenet earned A+ while everyone else earned A's.

Conclusion

There are two levels of recognition awarded to companies that participate in the tests. There is no ‘best’ declared, it’s simply tiered, it’s hard to come up with an objective ranking system because of the complex nature of hosting. These tests also don’t take into account outside factors such as reviews, support, and features. It is simply testing performance as described in the methodology.

Top Tier

This year's Top Tier WordPress Hosting Performance Award goes to the following companies who showed virtually no signs of struggle during the testing.


Honorable Mention

The following companies earned Honorable Mention status because they did very well and had a minor issue or two holding them back from earning Top Tier status.


Individual Host Analysis

Cloudways had the 4th fastest average response time on the static test. Cloudways had the fastest WPT test in two locations and were a mere 2ms behind 3rd place for fastest average. Cloudways also had the second fastest PHP bench. The uptime issue where Hetrix Tools couldn't connect to any Cloudways servers persisted across every plan while the Uptime Robot monitor showed them all online. Cloudways earned itself an Honorable Mention because the Load Storm test was extremely borderline. It showed some load spikes and they were averaging over 1000ms, but this was incredibly close. Overall, a great job, one of the closest to Top Tier performances I've had to evaluate.
Visit Cloudways Website
New entrant MechanicWeb came in with servers blazing. MechanicWeb had the fastest PHP and WP Bench scores by a good margin. They were the fastest and second fastest scores across all price tiers respectively. MechanicWeb also had the fastest wp-login response time on the Load Storm test. It handled the static test with ease. It's nice to see a new entrant earn itself Top Tier status and push some of the fastest scores we've ever seen.
Visit MechanicWeb Website
Nexcess handled the Load Storm test without much issue, there was one spike but the average response time stayed below 1000ms. The static test was handled without any problem. Nexcess had excellent uptime. While their numbers didn't lead the pack, they quietly had a solid performance earning Top Tier status. Congrats!
Visit Nexcess Website
Pressable had the fastest average and p95 response times in the static test at a lightning fast 5.8ms and 18ms respectively. Pressable had the second fastest login cumulative average. Pressable had the second fastest WPT test average and was a mere 7ms behind first. Throw in perfect and near perfect uptime monitors and you've got yourself a Top Tier award. Well done.
Visit Pressable Website
Raidboxes had excellent uptime. Raidboxes handled the static load test without issue. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test proved to overwhelm the server and caused it to slow down and eventually error out.
Visit raidboxes Website
SaveinCloud had the fastest WPT score in their native Brazil. They had perfect and near perfect uptime on both monitors. It handled the static test without issue. SaveinCloud's Load Storm test was pretty good but there were a lot of spikes which went over 1000ms which is why it earned an Honorable Mention this year. They are on the cusp of earning Top Tier status.
Visit SaveinCloud Website
Scaleforce had the second fastest average (9.3ms) and p95 (28ms) score on the static test. Scaleforce had the 2nd fastest page, asset and wplogin speeds on the Load Storm test. Scaleforce had perfect uptime on both monitors. Scaleforce had the fastest average on WPT including being the fastest or tied for fastest in 6/12 locations. Yet another well earned Top Tier performance for Scaleforce.
Visit Scaleforce powered by Virtuozzo Website
Servebolt had the second fastest P95 in the Load Storm Test. It handled the static test easily. It had the third fastest average on the WPT. Great uptime and the second fastest WP bench score easily put them in the Top Tier again. Well done.
Visit Servebolt Website
Simplenet had the third fastest WP Bench. Simplenet also had perfect and near perfect uptime metrics. It handled the static test without issue. Unfortunately, the Load Storm test proved too much for the plan and it ultimately ended up erroring with increased response times. For a new entrant they did quite well, hopefully they come back next year and earn some recognition.
Visit Simplenet Website
SiteGround had the fastest P95 and page load speeds on the Load Storm test. SiteGround had the third fastest average and p95 response times in the static test. Overall an excellent performance from SiteGround has put them back in the Top Tier.
Visit SiteGround Website

About the Author

Kevin Ohashi

Kevin Ohashi is the geek-in-charge at Review Signal. He is passionate about making data meaningful for consumers. Kevin is based in Washington, DC.

Recommended Articles

Want updates sent to your email?

Subscribe to our Newsletter